Organizing cross-sectoral collaboration in river basin management: case studies from the Rhine and the Zhujiang (Pearl River) basins
Organizing cross-sectoral collaboration in river basin management: case studies from the Rhine and the Zhujiang (Pearl River) basins
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15715124.2016.1170692
复制
发表时间：
2016-06
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
André Silveira;S. Junier;Frank Hüesker;Fan Qunfang;Andreas Rondorf
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
André Silveira;S. Junier;Frank Hüesker;Fan Qunfang;Andreas Rondorf
摘要本文分析了流域管理中有效跨部门合作的驱动因素和制约因素，以及相关文献中确定的因素在多大程度上决定了选定案例研究中合作的成败。所选的案例来自工业化和人口稠密的集水区，在那里，人类活动之间的权衡尤为激烈。本文重点介绍三个子流域：一个在莱茵河的荷兰段，第二个在莱茵河的德国段，第三个在中国的珠江流域。本次评选的灵感来自于中欧河流流域管理项目的工作（2007-2012年），在两个层面上进行了比较分析：（a）中国和欧洲子流域之间的比较分析，以更好地了解两种截然不同的流域治理制度下的合作管理形式;（B）在莱茵河的两个欧洲案例之间进行比较，以评估同一流域内的合作安排如何不同。实证工作调查了跨部门合作如何在关键的集水管理过程中运作;合作举措背后的驱动因素是什么;以及是否有障碍阻碍合作的出现。我们的研究结果突出了各种机制，通过这些机制，更广泛的正式和非正式的制度环境，以及制度相互作用的过程，影响文献中确定的更接近的因素。此外，我们的研究说明了行动者网络和国家在启动和维持水资源管理和流域治理合作方面发挥的核心作用。
ABSTRACT This paper analyses the drivers and constraints for effective cross-sectoral collaboration in river basin management and the extent to which factors identified in related literature determine success or failure of collaboration in selected case studies. Cases selected were from industrialized and densely populated catchments, where trade offs across human activities are particularly intense. This article focuses on three sub-basins: one in the Dutch section of the Rhine; a second in the German section of the Rhine; and a third in China’s Zhujiang (Pearl River) basin. This selection, inspired by the work of the EU-China River Basin Management Programme (2007–2012), enabled a comparative analysis on two levels: (a) between the Chinese and the European sub-basins in order to better understand collaborative forms of management in two very different basin governance regimes; (b) between the two European cases in the Rhine in order to assess how collaborative arrangements vary within the same basin. Empirical work enquired into how cross-sectoral collaboration operates in key catchment management processes; what drivers lie behind collaboration initiatives; and whether obstacles hinder the emergence of collaboration. Our findings highlight various mechanisms through which the wider formal and informal institutional contexts, and processes of institutional interplay, influence more proximate factors identified in the literature. Furthermore, our research illustrates the central role that actor networks and the state play in initiating and sustaining collaboration in water management and river basin governance.