Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduño: sexual conflict and female choice
Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduño: sexual conflict and female choice
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00179-4
复制
发表时间:
2003-09
影响因子:
16.8
通讯作者:
T. Chapman;G. Arnqvist;J. Bangham;L. Rowe
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Chapman;G. Arnqvist;J. Bangham;L. Rowe
Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Cordoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduno: sexual conflict and female choice important issue both theoretically and experimentally [5], researchers ignore how female reproductive traits intervene during fertilization. Once this is clarified, we can then ascribe female traits as ‘resistant’or ‘selective’. The second is to study the genetics of the female preference and associated male traits [5]. A genetic correlation is expected between both traits only if traditional female choice is occurring. The third and final approach is to track the rates of origin of female and male traits on phylogenies once resistance or selectivity has been determined. This will explain the prevalence of either process. Studies of fruit flies and water striders have suggested that negative fitness outcomes for females are a widespread phenomenon, but it is premature to claim that sexual conflict is widespread based on data from relatively few taxa. Related to this, no discussion was made by Chapman et al. of recent studies showing how females control both their reproductive decisions and the fitness payoffs accrued by them (eg [6–10]). By omitting them, readers might not only believe that the dichotomy of sexual conflict and female choice does not exist, but, if it did, that it has been settled in favour of sexual conflict.