Community theory: Testing environmental stress models
Community theory: Testing environmental stress models
复制标题
社区理论：测试环境压力模型
DOI：
10.1111/ele.14240
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
8.8
通讯作者：
Menge, Bruce A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Menge, Bruce A.
随着气候变化的加剧以及人们越来越需要了解其对生态社区的影响，测试环境压力模型（ESM）成为了新的重点。使用以前的文献检索加上参考文献，从最近的搜索，我评估了经验支持ESM，重点是消费者对猎物的压力是否减少（消费者压力模型; CSM）或增加（猎物压力模型; PSM）与环境压力的增加。应用测试ESM需要在沿着环境应力梯度的多个地点进行研究的标准，分析发现CSM是最常见的，“无影响”和PSM发生频率低但相似。这一结果与之前的一项调查形成鲜明对比，在这项调查中，“无影响”研究最为频繁，因此表明消费者通常比猎物更受压力的抑制。因此，气候变化引起的环境压力增加似乎可能会减少，而不是增加消费者对猎物的影响，而不是相反
Intensifying climate change and an increasing need for understanding its impacts on ecological communities places new emphasis on testing environmental stress models (ESMs). Using a prior literature search plus references from a more recent search, I evaluated empirical support for ESMs, focusing on whether consumer pressure on prey decreased (consumer stress model; CSM) or increased (prey stress model; PSM) with increasing environmental stress. Applying the criterion that testing ESMs requires conducting research at multiple sites along environmental stress gradients, the analysis found that CSMs were most frequent, with ‘No Effect’ and PSMs occurring at low but similar frequencies. This result contrasts to a prior survey in which ‘No Effect’ studies were most frequent, thus suggesting that consumers are generally more suppressed by stress than prey. Thus, increased climate change‐induced environmental stress seems likely to reduce, not increase impacts of consumers on prey more often than the reverse