Have a say over what you see
Have a say over what you see
复制标题
对您所看到的内容发表意见
DOI：
10.1145/1502650.1502659
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Tucker S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tucker S
我们每天都会遇到许多我们没有时间完整处理的文件。然而，我们缺乏从这些文档中快速浏览和识别关键信息的良好工具。本文开发并评估了交互式压缩（IC）技术，该技术允许用户动态配置他们在文档中查看的信息量，例如，通过自动从视图中删除不重要的信息（Excision）或通过使重要信息更突出（highlight）。我们在会议记录的背景下探索IC技术，这些记录通常是非结构化的，这使得很难隔离相关区域并提取关键信息。我们证明了集成电路与未经修改的文本控件相比的优越性。与传统的摘要相比，我们的结果显示了交互式摘要的广泛使用，而不是固定压缩级别的摘要。它们还显示了单词压缩的价值，而不是基于话语的压缩。不同的IC设计之间也存在权衡。删除允许用户以比突出显示更快的速度扫描文档，但代价是忽略文档的相关部分。
We all encounter many documents on a daily basis that we do not have time to process in their entirety. Nevertheless, we lack good tools to rapidly skim and identify key information from within such documents. This paper develops and evaluates Interactive Compression (IC) techniques that allow users to dynamically configure the amount of information they view in a document, e.g. by automatically removing unimportant information from view (Excision) or by making important information more salient (Highlighting). We explore IC techniques in the context of meeting transcripts that are typically unstructured - making it difficult to isolate relevant regions and extract key information. We demonstrate the superiority of IC compared with an unmodified text control. In contrast to traditional summaries, our results show extensive use of interactive, as opposed to fixed compression level, summarization. They also show the value of word- as opposed to utterance-based compression. There are also trade-offs between different IC designs. Excision allows users to scan documents faster than Highlighting but at the expense of overlooking relevant sections of the document.