Building resilience: Mainstreaming community participation into integrated assessment of resilience to climatic hazards in metropolitan land use management
Building resilience: Mainstreaming community participation into integrated assessment of resilience to climatic hazards in metropolitan land use management
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.029
复制
发表时间：
2016-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
7.1
通讯作者：
Liu, Yi-Chung
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hung, Hung-Chih;Yang, Ching-Yi;Liu, Yi-Chung
建设抵御能力对于大都市土地利用规划至关重要，以增强应对和尽量减少气候灾害风险的能力。大都市机构在确定衡量弹性的组成部分或指标方面仍然面临挑战。特别是，气候变化的不确定性和当地环境的多样化迫使城市规划者将社区参与、本土知识和当地属性纳入复原力评估的主流。本文旨在提出一种评估弹性的新方法，该方法可以鼓励利益相关者参与并与规划者沟通制定大都市土地使用政策。本文以台湾台中市为研究区域，创建了一个名为“地方气候灾害复原力指标”(CHRIL) 的复原力指标，该指标适合在政策背景下使用。然后，该指标将模糊多标准决策分析与参与式地理信息系统方法相结合，以测量和绘制对气候灾害的抵御能力。通过专家、当地官员和社区成员的参与，采用多变量分析来解释为什么特定地点会出现低复原力地区。此外，我们进行了聚类分析，将这些地区分为几种恢复力类型，并揭示了恢复力因素与当地整体发展模式之间的关系。结果表明，一些复原力因素，特别是社会经济脆弱性和适应能力之间可能存在冲突和权衡。研究结果为利益相关者和政策制定者提供了更好的治理结构，以设计和综合针对不同类型的复原力区域的适当的规划措施，以减少气候灾害风险。 (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. 保留所有权利。
Building resilience is critical for metropolitan land use planning to strengthen the ability to cope with and minimize climatic disaster risks. Challenges still remain for metropolitan agencies in identifying the components or metrics for measuring resilience. Particularly, uncertainties in climate change and diversification in local contexts compel urban planners to mainstream community participation, indigenous knowledge and local attributes into the resilience assessment. This article aims to propose a novel methodology for assessing resilience, which can encourage stakeholder participation and communicate planners in shaping metropolitan land use policies. Using the Taichung metropolis, Taiwan as the study area, this article created a resilience metric called the Climatic Hazard Resilience Indicators for Localities (CHRIL) that is appropriate for use in a policy context. Then, this metric combined a fuzzy multicriteria decision analysis with a participatory geographic information system approach to measure and map resilience to climatic hazards. Through the participation of experts, local officers and community members, a multivariate analysis was applied to explain why low resilience areas occur in specific locations. Moreover, we performed a cluster analysis to group the areas into several types of resilience and revealed the relationship between the resilience factors and overall local development patterns. Results show that conflicts and tradeoffs may exist between some resilience factors, especially socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptive capacity. The findings provide stakeholders and policy-makers with a better governance structure to design and synthesize appropriate patchworks of planning measures for different types of resilience areas to reduce climatic hazard risks. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.