Governmentality and Rights and Responsibilities in Urban Policy
Governmentality and Rights and Responsibilities in Urban Policy
复制标题
城市政策中的治理与权利和责任
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Imrie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Raco;R. Imrie
我们部署福柯的治理概念的各个方面来讨论的论点，最近转向“权利和责任”的议程在城市政策的一部分，更广泛的转变的理性和技术的政府。继罗斯之后，我们将城市政策的新兴形式视为“先进自由主义”或战略的一部分，这些战略旨在激活公民，个人和集体，为自己的政府承担更大的责任。正如罗斯所指出的，这些战略是寻求通过在各种各样的地方将政府主体自己的自治属性工具化来进行治理。我们将论证分为三个部分。第一部分证明了使用福柯的框架，在寻求理解新的政治和政策议程的“权利和责任”。在第二部分中，我们主要通过单一再生预算的背景下，调查政府的理性和治理技术的变化性质。在这样做的时候，我们考虑两个相互关联的维度的理性和技术的政府，试图塑造和指导福柯所说的“他人的行为”或那些是政府的对象，即积极的公民。这些维度是通过社区的政府和政府主体的具体化。最后，我们指定的重要性，我们重视使用福柯的框架分析城市政策和政策过程更普遍。
We deploy aspects of Foucault's concept of governmentality to discuss the argument that the recent shift towards a ‘rights and responsibilities' agenda in urban policy is part of broader transformations in the rationalities and techniques of government. Following Rose, we characterise the emergent forms of urban policy as part of ‘advanced liberalism’ or strategies which seek to activate citizens, individually and collectively, to take greater responsibility for their own government. Such strategies are, as Rose notes, seeking to govern through the instrumentalisation of the self-governing properties of the subjects of government themselves in a whole variety of locales. We develop the argument in three parts. The first part justifies the use of a Foucauldian framework in seeking to understand the new political and policy agenda on ‘rights and responsibilities’. In a second part, we investigate the changing nature of governmental rationalities and techniques of governmentality primarily through the context of the Single Regeneration Budget. In so doing, we consider two interrelated dimensions of the rationalities and techniques of government which seek to shape and guide what Foucault refers to as ‘the conduct of others' or those that are the objects of government, that is, active citizens. These dimensions are government through community and the specification of subjects of government. We conclude by specifying the importance we attach to using a Foucauldian framework for the analysis of urban policy and policy processes more generally.