Building Schools for the Future: Lessons Learned From Performance Evaluations of Five Secondary Schools and Academies in England
Building Schools for the Future: Lessons Learned From Performance Evaluations of Five Secondary Schools and Academies in England
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fbuil.2018.00022
复制
发表时间：
2018-04
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
E. Burman;J. Kimpian;D. Mumovic
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Burman;J. Kimpian;D. Mumovic
根据英格兰未来建筑学校（BSF）计划建造的五所中学和学院的建筑性能评估（BPE）发现，所有这些建筑中与运营能源性能相关的二氧化碳排放量高于中学的中位数。虽然与良好实践和典型基准相比，建筑织物性能的新法规要求导致了热能的一些改善，但热能使用与设计预期之间仍然存在显着差异。这些建筑的用电量也比中等学校高出37-191%，明显低于设计预期。这些结果表明，重要的是使用后的建筑微调和测量和验证的性能在使用方面的设计预测，以缩小性能差距。此外，亦有需要订明清晰的运营表现目的，并在整个建筑物采购及运营过程中，避免采用价值评估工程的能源效益措施，以达致良好的表现水平。最后，建议采用能源，环境质量和教育绩效的整体观，以更好地了解学校的绩效和能源效率措施和室内环境质量（IEQ）之间的潜在冲突。
Building performance evaluations (BPE) of five secondary schools and academies constructed under the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme in England found that CO2 emissions associated with operational energy performance in all these buildings is higher than the median of the secondary schools. Whilst the new regulatory requirements for building fabric performance have led to some improvements in heating energy when compared against good practice and typical benchmarks, there is still significant discrepancy between heating energy use and the design expectations. Electricity use in these buildings is also 37–191% more than the median school and significantly worse than the design expectations. These results point to the importance of post-occupancy building fine-tuning and measurement and verification of performance in-use with respect to design projections to narrow the performance gap. It is also necessary to set out clear operational performance targets and protect energy efficiency measures from value engineering throughout building procurement and in operation to achieve good level of performance. Finally, it is suggested to adopt a holistic view of energy, environmental quality, and educational performance to have a better understanding of schools' performance and potential conflicts between energy efficiency measures and indoor environmental quality (IEQ).