Sentencing and Crime Policy for Sex Offenders in Japan：The Possible Impact of
Sentencing and Crime Policy for Sex Offenders in Japan：The Possible Impact of
复制标题
日本性犯罪者的量刑和犯罪政策：可能的影响
DOI：
10.1002/9781118314876.ch10
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mari Hirayama
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
宮井雅明;齊藤高広;柴田潤子;池田千鶴;長谷川亜希子;小島淳;平山真理;堀田周吾;甘利航司;堀田周吾;甘利航司;甘利航司;Mari Hirayama
本章重点介绍自 2009 年 5 月引入 Saiban-in 制度（非专业法官制度）以来日本性犯罪者量刑和刑事司法政策的最新变革。日本 2004 年的奈良案对性犯罪刑事司法政策产生了巨大影响。其影响体现在三个不同的领域：性犯罪者在监狱中的治疗计划；性犯罪者缓刑期间的治疗方案；以及性犯罪者住所追踪系统。日本的非专业法官制度与美国、英国的陪审团制度有很大不同。在这种制度下，六名非专业人士和三名专业法官共同审理案件。看来，在引入非专业法官制度后，许多人现在有兴趣在犯罪政策中发挥更积极的作用。
This chapter focuses on the recent revolutions in sentencing and criminal justice policy for sex offenders in Japan since the introduction of the Saiban‐in System (lay judge system) in May 2009. A single case called theNara casein 2004 in Japan had a huge impact on the criminal justice policy on sex crimes. Its impact can be seen in three different arenas: sex offenders' treatment programs in prison; sex offenders' treatment programs when they are on probation; and the tracking system for sex offenders' residences. The Japanese lay judge system is quite different from the jury system in the United States and the United Kingdom. Under this system, six lay people and three professional judges try the case together. It seems that, after the introduction of the lay judge system, many people are now interested in playing a more active role in crime policy.