Development and psychometric evaluation of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for a chiropractic curriculum.
Development and psychometric evaluation of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for a chiropractic curriculum.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.10.011
复制
发表时间：
2012-11
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Bhalerao S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Leo MC;Peterson D;Haas M;LeFebvre R;Bhalerao S
本研究的目的是描述用于评估循证实践 (EBP) 课程重要要素的问卷开发过程，并报告问卷主要组成部分（EBP 知识考试）的初始信度和效度测试。 EBP 知识测试由参加脊椎按摩疗法博士项目的学生进行评估。初始版本以 374 名学生为样本进行了测试，修订版以 196 名学生为样本进行了测试。使用项目难度、项目区分度和内部一致性来评估项目表现和可靠性。专家小组评估了表面和内容的有效性。第一版知识考试内部一致性较低（KR20=0.55），部分试题难度和区分度较差。这导致项目数量从 20 个增加到 40 个，并对初始版本中表现不佳的项目进行了修订。第二版的KR20为0.68； 32 个项目的项目难度在 0.20 到 0.80 之间，26 个项目的项目区分度值为 0.20 或更大。开发并评估了用于评估修订后的 EBP 综合课程的调查问卷。 EBP 知识成分的心理测量测试为可接受的可靠性和有效性提供了一些初步证据。
The purpose of this study was to describe the questionnaire development process for evaluating important elements of an evidence-based practice (EBP) curriculum and to report on initial reliability and validity testing for the primary component of the questionnaire, an EBP knowledge exam. The EBP knowledge test was evaluated with students enrolled in a doctor of chiropractic program. The initial version was tested with a sample of 374 and a revised version with a sample of 196 students. Item performance and reliability were assessed using item difficulty, item discrimination, and internal consistency. An expert panel assessed face and content validity. The first version of the knowledge exam demonstrated a low internal consistency (KR20=0.55) and a few items had poor item difficulty and discrimination. This resulted in an expansion in the number of items from 20 to 40, as well as a revision of the poorly performing items from the initial version. The KR20 of the second version was 0.68; 32 items had item difficulties of between 0.20 and 0.80 and 26 items had item discrimination values of 0.20 or greater. A questionnaire for evaluating a revised EBP integrated curriculum was developed and evaluated. Psychometric testing of the EBP knowledge component provided some initial evidence for acceptable reliability and validity.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032
发表时间：
1992-11-04
影响因子：
120.7
作者：
GUYATT, G
通讯作者：
GUYATT, G
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Davidson, RA;Duerson, M;Watson, RT
通讯作者：
Watson, RT
影响因子：
105.7
作者：
Fritsche, L;Greenhalgh, T;Kunz, R
通讯作者：
Kunz, R
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
LANDRY, FJ;PANGARO, L;HERBERS, J
通讯作者：
HERBERS, J
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Akl, EA;Izuchukwu, IS;Schünemann, HJ
通讯作者：
Schünemann, HJ