The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version

The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s007870050057
复制
发表时间:
1998-09-01
影响因子:
6.4
通讯作者:
Bailey, V
Bailey, V
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Goodman, R;Meltzer, H;Bailey, V

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

采用自我报告版本的优势与困难问卷(SDQ)对两组11-16岁的青少年进行了调查:83名社区青少年和116名参加心理健康诊所的青少年。问卷对两个样本进行了令人满意的区分。例如,总困难评分的诊所平均值比社区平均值高1.4个标准差,诊所病例在异常范围内得分的可能性超过6倍。自我报告的SDQ分数与教师或家长评定的SDQ分数之间的相关性与之前一系列测量的平均交叉信息相关比较有利。自我报告SDQ看起来很有希望,值得进一步评估。
The self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was administered to two samples of 11-16 year olds: 83 young people in the community and 116 young people attending a mental health clinic. The questionnaire discriminated satisfactorily between the two samples. For example, the clinic mean for the total difficulties score was 1.4 standard deviations above the community mean, with clinic cases being over six ti:mes more likely to have a score in the abnormal range. The correlations between self-report SDQ scores and teacher- or parent-rated SDQ scores compared favourably with the average cross-informant correlations In previous studies of a range of measures. The self-report SDQ appears promising and warrants further evaluation.