Computing bounds on product graph pebbling numbers

Computing bounds on product graph pebbling numbers
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.tcs.2019.09.050
复制
发表时间:
2019-05
期刊:
Theor. Comput. Sci.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Franklin Kenter;Daphne E. Skipper;Dan Wilson
Franklin Kenter;Daphne E. Skipper;Dan Wilson
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Franklin Kenter;Daphne E. Skipper;Dan Wilson

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

给定一个pebble分布到图的顶点,pebbling移动从一个顶点移除两个pebble,并将一个pebble放在相邻的顶点上。pebbling数π(G)是最小的数,使得对于任意π(G)pebbles到G的顶点的分布和G的根点r的选择,存在一个pebbling移动序列,将pebbling放置在r上。计算π(G)是可证明困难的,并且最近用于界定π(G)的方法已被证明在计算上难以处理,即使是中等大小的图。Graham证明了π(G□ H)≤ π(G)π(H),其中G□ H是G和H的笛卡尔积(1989).虽然这个猜想已经在特定的图族中得到了验证,但一般来说它仍然是开放的。本研究的重点是开发一种计算上易于处理的,基于IP的方法来生成π(G□ H)的良好界限,其目标是阐明Graham猜想。我们提供计算结果的各种笛卡尔积图,包括一些已知的满足格雷厄姆猜想和一些不。我们的方法导致了一个相当大的改进最知名的界π(L□ L),其中L是Lemke图,L□ L是最小的已知潜在的反例格雷厄姆猜想。
Given a distribution of pebbles to the vertices of a graph, a pebbling move removes two pebbles from a single vertex and places a single pebble on an adjacent vertex. The pebbling number π (G) is the smallest number such that, for any distribution of π (G) pebbles to the vertices of G and choice of root vertex r of G, there exists a sequence of pebbling moves that places a pebble on r. Computing π (G) is provably difficult, and recent methods for bounding π (G) have proved computationally intractable, even for moderately sized graphs. Graham conjectured that π (G□ H)≤ π (G) π (H), where G□ H is the Cartesian product of G and H (1989). While the conjecture has been verified for specific families of graphs, in general it remains open. This study combines the focus of developing a computationally tractable, IP-based method for generating good bounds on π (G□ H), with the goal of shedding light on Graham's conjecture. We provide computational results for a variety of Cartesian-product graphs, including some that are known to satisfy Graham's conjecture and some that are not. Our approach leads to a sizable improvement on the best known bound for π (L□ L), where L is the Lemke graph, and L□ L is among the smallest known potential counterexamples to Graham's conjecture.