Reply from Jacob Graves McPherson, Albert Chen, Michael D. Ellis, Jun Yao, C. J. Heckman and Julius P. A. Dewald.
Reply from Jacob Graves McPherson, Albert Chen, Michael D. Ellis, Jun Yao, C. J. Heckman and Julius P. A. Dewald.
复制标题
Jacob Graves McPherson、Albert Chen、Michael D. Ellis、Jun Yao、C. J. Heckman 和 Julius P. A. Dewald 的回复。
DOI：
10.1113/jp278464
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Dewald,JuliusPA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McPherson,JacobGraves;Chen,Albert;Ellis,MichaelD;Yao,Jun;Heckman,CJ;Dewald,JuliusPA
在”统计和旋转：现在是时候改进了”，Gandevia和Heroux继续他们在生物医学研究中改进统计报告的追求，特别是在《生理学杂志》中。([2])首先，我们感谢Gandevia和Heroux注意到图中误差线或误差线的定义的意外遗漏。令人失望的是，Gandevia和Heroux没有根据地指出，我们故意省略了误差线的定义，这样做是因为我们不确定”哪一个更好”。[摘自文章]
In" Statistics and spin: it's time to improve", Gandevia and Heroux continue their pursuit of improved statistical reporting in biomedical research, and specifically within I The Journal of Physiology i.([2]), first, we thank Gandevia and Heroux for noticing the accidental omission of the definition of error bars or asterisks in Fig. It is disappointing that Gandevia and Heroux suggest-without basis-that we purposefully omitted the definition of our error bars and did so because we are uncertain" which is better".[Extracted from the article]