CAVITATION AND THE INFLUENCE OF HEADSHAPE IN ATTACK OF THICK TARGETS BY NON-DEFORMING PROJECTILES
CAVITATION AND THE INFLUENCE OF HEADSHAPE IN ATTACK OF THICK TARGETS BY NON-DEFORMING PROJECTILES
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0022-5096(80)90019-8
复制
发表时间:
1980-01-01
影响因子:
5.3
通讯作者:
HILL, R
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
HILL, R
THIS is an account of some scientific work of mine during the Second World War. Between May 1943 and March 1946 I was employed by the Ministry of Supply in the Armament Research Department at Fort Halstead near Sevenoaks in Kent. Among a variety of assignments, I investigated the resistance of very thick armour to attack by projectiles with tungsten-carbide cores. My attention focussed on the influence of headshape in the upper range of striking velocities then attainable or contemplated(1.0 to 1.5 x lo3 m sl). Although the cores themselves did not deform in this range, the holes they made at normal incidence were slightly bell-shapedhence more than calibre diameter near entry (this was virtually obvious only when the core was not carried by the usual sabot which caused masking damage to the target surface). This phenomenon I called cavitation, borrowing the term from hydrodynamics. It appeared likely that cavitation could seriously degrade the performance of anti-tank weapons, because the enhanced expansion of a hole absorbed kinetic energy that otherwise would have gone towards penetration. Accordingly, a mechanics of target deformation had to be developed to the point where the role of headshape could be modelled realistically. My original studies, which included exhaustive analyses of ad hoc tests in the laboratory and in the field, are set out at length in four official reports. Here I present the final version of the theory and an outline of the principal experimental findings. To avoid anachronism, I have not attempted to amplify the mathematics (save for an occasional detail) nor have I searched the earlier literature for cognate work. Nonetheless, from a general acquaintance with engineering plasticity, I am persuaded that such cavitation in metals has not been comparably treated during the intervening thirty-five years. No doubt this is in part because military terminal-ballistics activity had turned to hypervelocity attack, where the missile itself deforms and the entire physics is different in kind. t ‘0 Controller Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1980.