The cone and the lazy bubble: two efficient alternatives between the point cursor and the bubble cursor
The cone and the lazy bubble: two efficient alternatives between the point cursor and the bubble cursor
复制标题
圆锥体和惰性气泡：点光标和气泡光标之间的两种有效替代方案
DOI：
10.1145/1357054.1357107
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kari
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Joona Laukkanen;Poika Isokoski;Kari
我们评估了Grossman和Balakrishnan在传统点光标和气泡光标之间的连续统中的两种光标设计。当距离最近的目标和次近的目标的距离比小于1：2时，懒气泡光标扩展到包围最近的目标。除了这种懒惰的行为之外，圆锥形光标的尾巴一直停留在最后一个被包裹的目标上，直到下一个目标被包裹。在一项有18名参与者参与的实验中，我们发现气泡光标比目标激活区域较小的光标速度更快，但差异仍然很小。在气泡游标变量中，惰性气泡的错误率高于其他两个。因此，客观指标的赢家是气泡光标和锥形光标。在主观评分中，懒惰的气泡光标和气泡光标更受欢迎。
We evaluated two cursor designs in the continuum between the traditional point cursor and the bubble cursor by Grossman and Balakrishnan. The lazy bubble cursor expanded to envelop the closest target when the ratio of the distances to the closest and the second closest target was less than 1:2. In addition to this lazy behavior the cone cursor had a tail that stayed on the last enveloped target until the next target was enveloped. In an experiment with 18 participants we found that the bubble cursor was faster than our cursors that had smaller target activation areas but the difference remained very small. Of the bubble cursor variants the lazy bubble exhibited higher error rate than the other two. Thus, the winners on the objective metrics were the bubble cursor and the cone cursor. The lazy bubble cursor and the bubble cursor were preferred in subjective ratings.