On the criticality of mapping practices: Geodesign as critical GIS?
On the criticality of mapping practices: Geodesign as critical GIS?
复制标题
关于制图实践的重要性：地理设计作为关键的 GIS？
DOI：
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.017
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
9.1
通讯作者：
Matthew W. Wilson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matthew W. Wilson
近年来，地理空间设计作为技术发展、地理科学研究和设计实践的一个领域应运而生。随着ESRI领导这一新兴领域的品牌推广，地理空间技术开发商、设计咨询公司和学术单位正在认识到将地理可视化和地理分析技术应用于设计和规划领域中更传统的实践所带来的好处。此外，面对“大数据”和新地理学，地理信息系统正被要求重新阐明他们的研究议程。本文从关键程度或地图实践在关键研究中的应用方式方面考察了这些发展--既有寻求确定地理空间技术出现的地点的研究，也有更直接地将这些技术作为方法的研究。在这些发展中，测绘实践的关键是什么？更具体地说，对于设计和规划领域，GeoDesign如何与关键的地理信息系统保持一致？在考察GeoDesign出现的条件时，我通过追踪制图中临界性的三个前提来回答这些问题：代表性和未来性，中立性和有效性，以及关联性和复杂性。最后，我概述了进一步推进关键地质设计的研究议程。
In recent years, geospatial design (or geodesign) has emerged as an area of technological development, GIScience research, and design practice. With Esri leading the branding of this emerging area, geospatial technology developers, design consultancies, and academic units are recognizing the affordances of applying geovisualization and geoanalytical techniques to more conventional practices within design and planning fields. Additionally, the GISciences are being called to rearticulate their research agendas in the face of ‘big data’ and neogeography. This paper examines these developments with regard to criticality, or the ways in which mapping practices are applied in critical research – both research that seeks to situate the emergence of geospatial technologies and enrolls these technologies more directly as method. What is the criticality of mapping practices amid these developments? More specifically to the design and planning fields, how might geodesign align with critical GIS? I take up these questions by tracing three presuppositions of criticality in mapping while examining the conditions of geodesign's emergence: representation and futurity, neutrality and efficacy, and relationality and complexity. I conclude by outlining a research agenda for further advancement of a critical geodesign.