Recognition memory and introspective remember/know judgments: Evidence for the influence of distractor plausibility on "remembering" and a caution about purportedly nonparametric measures
Recognition memory and introspective remember/know judgments: Evidence for the influence of distractor plausibility on "remembering" and a caution about purportedly nonparametric measures
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/bf03195315
复制
发表时间：
2005-03-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Benjamin, AS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Benjamin, AS
在人类再认记忆研究中，一种流行的技术涉及记忆和认知判断的引出以及这些判断对记忆提取的定性状态的归因。另一种观点，在这里审查，涉及定量，而不是定性，证据的差异作为这两个判断的基础。该理论提出了两个明确且可检验的预测：“记忆”中的标准转换和不同反应集之间的等分辨力。在这个实验中，在识别测试中的分心物集的化妆被证明会影响整体识别标准和“记住”的反应率。文章的第二部分展示了X是如何一个糟糕的选择来测试预测的isodiscriminability措施。当对该测量进行校正（等式7）以使其与关于再认记忆中的接收器操作特征的当前知识更一致时，它揭示了“记住”和所有积极响应之间的可辨别性没有差异。
One popular technique in the study of human recognition memory involves the elicitation of remember and know judgments and the attribution of those judgments to qualitative states of memory retrieval. An alternative view, reviewed here, implicates quantitative, but not qualitative, differences in evidence as the basis for those two judgments. That theory makes two clear and testable predictions: that of criterion shifts in "remembering" and that of isodiscriminability across different response sets. In this experiment, the makeup of the distractor set in a recognition test is shown to influence overall recognition criterion and also rates of "remember" responses. The second portion of the article demonstrates how Xis a poor choice of a measure to test the prediction of isodiscriminability. When this measure is corrected (Equation 7) to make it more consistent with current knowledge about the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory, it reveals that there is no difference in discriminability between "remember" and all positive responses.