Differential effects of PD-L1 versus PD-1 blockade on myeloid inflammation in human cancer

Differential effects of PD-L1 versus PD-1 blockade on myeloid inflammation in human cancer
复制标题

DOI:
10.1172/jci.insight.129353
复制
发表时间:
2020-06-18
期刊:
影响因子:
8
通讯作者:
Dhodapkar, Madhav V.
Dhodapkar, Madhav V.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bar, Noffar;Costa, Federica;Dhodapkar, Madhav V.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景PD-1和PD-L1在临床上可互换地作为检查点进行研究,以重振不同肿瘤类型中的T细胞。检查点阻断在人类癌前病变中的生物学效应数据有限。我们在atezolizumab治疗无症状多发性骨髓瘤(AMM)(临床恶性肿瘤的前兆)患者的临床试验中分析了PD-L1阻断的免疫学效应。还将体内纯化的单核细胞和T细胞中PD-L1阻断的基因组特征与肺癌患者中PD-1阻断后的基因组特征进行了比较。分析PD-L1阻断对单核细胞来源的DC的影响,以更好地了解其对髓样抗原呈递细胞的影响。与抗PD-1治疗相反,抗PD-L1治疗导致CD 14+单核细胞中的独特炎症特征和骨髓来源的细胞因子(例如,IL-18)。atezolizumab治疗AMM患者导致循环髓样细胞快速活化和扩增,并持续存在于BM中。PD-L1对纯化的单核细胞来源的DC的阻断导致炎性小体的快速激活,并与CD 40 L驱动的DC成熟协同作用,导致更大的抗原特异性T细胞扩增。这些数据表明,与体内PD-1阻断相比,PD-L1阻断在人体中导致不同的全身免疫效应,特别是表现为快速骨髓活化。这些发现还表明PD-L1作为调节髓系细胞的炎性表型和DC中抗原呈递的检查点的额外作用,这可以用于改善基于PD-L1的联合疗法。
BACKGROUND. PD-1 and PD-L1 have been studied interchangeably in the clinic as checkpoints to reinvigorate T cells in diverse tumor types. Data for biologic effects of checkpoint blockade in human premalignancy are limited.METHODS. We analyzed the immunologic effects of PD-L1 blockade in a clinical trial of atezolizumab in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma (AMM), a precursor to clinical malignancy. Genomic signatures of PD-L1 blockade in purified monocytes and T cells in vivo were also compared with those following PD-1 blockade in lung cancer patients. Effects of PD-L1 blockade on monocyte-derived DCs were analyzed to better understand its effects on myeloid antigenpresenting cells.RESULTS. In contrast to anti-PD-1 therapy, anti-PD-L1 therapy led to a distinct inflammatory signature in CD14+ monocytes and increase in myeloid-derived cytokines (e.g., IL-18) in vivo. Treatment of AMM patients with atezolizumab led to rapid activation and expansion of circulating myeloid cells, which persisted in the BM. Blockade of PD-L1 on purified monocyte-derived DCs led to rapid inflammasome activation and synergized with CD40L-driven DC maturation, leading to greater antigen-specific T cell expansion.CONCLUSION. These data show that PD-L1 blockade leads to distinct systemic immunologic effects compared with PD-1 blockade in vivo in humans, particularly manifest as rapid myeloid activation. These findings also suggest an additional role for PD-L1 as a checkpoint for regulating inflammatory phenotype of myeloid cells and antigen presentation in DCs, which may be harnessed to improve PD-L1-based combination therapies.