Safeguarding adolescent mental health in India (SAMA): study protocol for codesign and feasibility study of a school systems intervention targeting adolescent anxiety and depression in India.
Safeguarding adolescent mental health in India (SAMA): study protocol for codesign and feasibility study of a school systems intervention targeting adolescent anxiety and depression in India.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054897
复制
发表时间:
2022-04-04
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Mallikarjun P
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hugh-Jones S;Janardhana N;Al-Janabi H;Bhola P;Cooke P;Fazel M;Hudson K;Khandeparkar P;Mirzoev T;Venkataraman S;West RM;Mallikarjun P
Symptoms of anxiety and depression in Indian adolescents are common. Schools can be opportune sites for delivery of mental health interventions. India, however, is without a evidence-based and integrated whole-school mental health approach. This article describes the study design for the safeguarding adolescent mental health in India (SAMA) project. The aim of SAMA is to codesign and feasibility test a suite of multicomponent interventions for mental health across the intersecting systems of adolescents, schools, families and their local communities in India. Our project will codesign and feasibility test four interventions to run in parallel in eight schools (three assigned to waitlist) in Bengaluru and Kolar in Karnataka, India. The primary aim is to reduce the prevalence of adolescent anxiety and depression. Codesign of interventions will build on existing evidence and resources. Interventions for adolescents at school will be universal, incorporating curriculum and social components. Interventions for parents and teachers will target mental health literacy, and also for teachers, training in positive behaviour practices. Intervention in the school community will target school climate to improve student mental health literacy and care. Intervention for the wider community will be via adolescent-led films and social media. We will generate intervention cost estimates, test outcome measures and identify pathways to increase policy action on the evidence. Ethical approval has been granted by the National Institute of Mental Health Neurosciences Research Ethics Committee (NIMHANS/26th IEC (Behv Sc Div/2020/2021)) and the University of Leeds School of Psychology Research Ethics Committee (PSYC-221). Certain data will be available on a data sharing site. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
发表时间:
2009-08-07
期刊:
Implementation science : IS
影响因子:
--
作者:
Damschroder LJ;Aron DC;Keith RE;Kirsh SR;Alexander JA;Lowery JC
通讯作者:
Lowery JC
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Bernal, G;Sáez-Santiago, E
通讯作者:
Sáez-Santiago, E
影响因子:
--
作者:
Arun, Priti;Garg, Rohit;Chavan, Bir Singh
通讯作者:
Chavan, Bir Singh
影响因子:
4
作者:
Gale NK;Heath G;Cameron E;Rashid S;Redwood S
通讯作者:
Redwood S
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Barry MM;Clarke AM;Jenkins R;Patel V
通讯作者:
Patel V