Electoral malpractice
Electoral malpractice
复制标题
选举舞弊
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jørgen Elklit
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Staffan Darnolf;Jørgen Elklit
包含各种竞选媒体（如YouChoose）的网站和候选人自己的网站。总之，有人认为，他们创造了“无与伦比的互动和信息获取的机会”，有助于使2008年成为“分水岭年”（第3页）。事实上，Marcela Garcia-Castanon等人使用了一些有趣的统计证据来支持他们的主张，即“互联网作为政治信息的来源在统计上是重要的，与政治参与呈正相关”（第219页），为选民提供了许多参与、表达想法和获取信息的机会。然而，正如他们承认的那样，需要做更多的工作来理解“互联网在动员和参与选民方面所发挥的作用”（第225页）。这是一本很有价值的散文集，为一场极其重要的选举提供了一些有趣的见解。许多作者承认，在美国总统选举方面还需要做更多的工作，这一承认使这篇文章更有价值。
tion websites incorporating a variety of campaign media (e.g. YouChoose) and the candidates’ own websites. Together, it is argued that they created ‘unparalleled opportunities for interaction and information acquisition’, helping to make 2008 a ‘watershed year’ (p. 3). Indeed, Marcela Garcia-Castanon et al. use some interesting statistical evidence to support their claim that the ‘Internet as a source of political information is statistically significant and positively related to political participation’ (p. 219), allowing numerous opportunities for voters to participate, express ideas and acquire information. However, as they concede, much more work needs to be done on understanding the role the ‘Internet plays in the mobilization and engagement of voters’ (p. 225). This is a valuable collection of essays offering some interesting insights into a tremendously important election. Many of the authors concede that much more work needs to be done on presidential elections in the USA, an admission that makes this text all the more worthwhile.