Dissenting Designers: Reading Activism and Advocacy in Architecture through a Sociological Lens
Dissenting Designers: Reading Activism and Advocacy in Architecture through a Sociological Lens
复制标题
持不同意见的设计师：通过社会学视角解读建筑中的行动主义和倡导
DOI：
10.1080/13264826.2020.1795974
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
0.1
通讯作者：
Roudbari, Shawhin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rowe, Matthew S.;Gjata, Joris;Roudbari, Shawhin
美国建筑史上有许多活动家和改革家的例子，他们试图使建筑行业更具包容性，公正性和社会参与性。本文提供了一个学术文献的回顾，讨论这些建筑师的努力，以确定历史趋势的研究活动家建筑师在美国，本文的重点。在职业发展和巩固的初期阶段之后，现代形式的社会参与出现在1960年代和1970年代。在随后的几十年里，这些努力中的许多都在继续，或者被复兴，同时学术界对这些努力的兴趣也在增加。然后，文章回顾了社会学研究的三个领域有关的社会参与设计的奖学金。这些集中在行业内的制度变化，指导建筑工作的“逻辑”，以及专业和学院之间的关系。本文探讨了这些机构的观点，他们的潜力，以补充框架分析设计异议。
The history of American architecture includes many examples of activists and reformers who sought to make the profession more inclusive, just, and socially engaged. This article provides a review of the academic literature discussing the efforts of such architects in order to identify historic trends in the study of activist architects in the United States—this paper’s focus. After an initial period of growth and consolidation in the profession, contemporary forms of social engagement emerged in the 1960s and 1970s. Subsequent decades have seen many of these efforts continue, or be revived, alongside increased academic interest in these same efforts. The article then reviews three areas of sociological research pertinent to the scholarship on socially engaged design. These focus on institutional change within the profession, the “logics” that guide architectural work, and the relationship between the profession and the academy. This article explores these institutional perspectives for their potential to complement frameworks for analyzing dissent in design.