A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders
A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00612.x
复制
发表时间:
2006-12-01
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Ury, Wayne A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sulmasy, Daniel P.;Sood, Johanna R.;Ury, Wayne A.
BACKGROUND: Some institutions require patients and families to give signed consent for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders, especially in New York State. As this may be a barrier to discussions about DNR orders, we changed a signed consent policy to a witnessed verbal consent policy, simplified and modified the DNR order forms, and educated the staff at 1 hospital, comparing the effects with an affiliated hospital where the policy was not changed.DESIGN: Prospective natural experiment with intervention and comparison sites.SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Pre- and postintervention, we surveyed house officers' confidence and attitudes, reviewed charts to assess the number of concurrent care concerns (CCCs) addressed per DNR order (e.g., limits on intubation or blood products or need for hospice), and at the intervention hospital, measured the stress levels of surrogates consenting for DNR orders using the Horowitz Impact of Event Scale. We also surveyed staff perceptions about the policy following the change.RESULTS: At the intervention hospital, the percentage of house officers reporting low confidence in their ability to obtain consent for DNR orders declined postintervention (24% to 7%, P=.002), while there was no significant change at the comparison hospital (20% vs 15%, P=.45). Among intervention hospital house officers, there were declines in percent reporting difficulty talking to patients and families about DNR orders, but no significant changes at the comparison hospital. At the intervention hospital, the mean number of CCCs/DNR order increased (1.0 pre to 4.2 post, P