Dosing Errors Made by Paramedics During Pediatric Patient Simulations After Implementation of a State-Wide Pediatric Drug Dosing Reference

Dosing Errors Made by Paramedics During Pediatric Patient Simulations After Implementation of a State-Wide Pediatric Drug Dosing Reference
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/10903127.2019.1619002
复制
发表时间:
2020-03-03
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Lammers, Richard L.
Lammers, Richard L.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hoyle, John D.;Ekblad, Glenn;Lammers, Richard L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:入院前儿科患者的给药错误发生率很高。为了减少错误,密歇根州实施了全州范围的儿科剂量参考(PDR),剂量以毫升为单位列出,要求使用旋塞阀从预装注射器中将剂量吸入较小的注射器中,并将某些药物稀释至不同浓度。目的:评估在全州范围内实施PDR后的用药错误率,包括遗漏和错误。研究方法:来自15个机构的EMS工作人员完成了4个经过验证的模拟场景:婴儿癫痫发作,婴儿心脏骤停,18个月大的烧伤和5岁的过敏性休克。机构有私人的,公共的,非营利性的,营利性的,城市的,农村的,消防的,和第三服务。EMS工作人员使用他们的常规设备,并被要求执行所有步骤,以管理药物剂量。两名评估员通过直接观察和视频审查对机组人员的表现进行评分。误差定义为与体重适当剂量相比差异20%。使用描述性统计。结果:共完成142次模拟。大多数船员(58.3%)是紧急医疗技术人员-辅助医务人员(EMTP)/EMTP。对于心脏骤停情况,51/70(72.9%; 95% CI:60.9%,82.8%)肾上腺素剂量是正确的。有6例(8.6%,95% CI:2.0%,15.1%)10倍过量,1例(1.4%; 95% CI:-1.4%,4.2%)10倍剂量不足。在癫痫发作情况下,28/50例(56.0%; 95% CI:42.2%,69.8%)苯二氮卓类药物剂量正确; 6/18例(33.3%; 95% CI:11.5%,55.1%)药物稀释不正确,导致给药错误。给药注射器中经常夹带无法识别的空气,导致剂量不足。总体而言,31.2%(95% CI:25.5%,36.6%)的药物剂量不正确。在18/142例(12.7%,95% CI:7.2%,18.2%)病例中,获得不正确的体重导致药物给药错误。遗漏的错误包括在癫痫发作情况下未能检查血糖,以及在过敏性休克中未能给予肾上腺素和液体推注。结论:尽管实施了PDR,给药错误(包括10倍错误)的发生率仍然很高。使用稀释和基于长度的磁带时会出现错误。除了PDR之外,儿科院前给药还需要进一步减少错误的策略,以针对遗漏错误。
Background: Drug dosing errors occur at a high rate for prehospital pediatric patients. To reduce errors, Michigan implemented a state-wide pediatric dosing reference (PDR), with doses listed in milliliters, the requirement that doses be drawn into a smaller syringe from a pre-loaded syringe using a stopcock, and dilution of certain drugs to different concentrations. Purpose: To evaluate the rate of medication errors, including errors of omission and commission, after implementation of a state-wide PDR. Methods: EMS crews from 15 agencies completed 4 validated, simulation scenarios: an infant seizing, an infant cardiac arrest, an 18-month-old with a burn, and 5-year-old with anaphylactic shock. Agencies were private, public, not-for-profit, for-profit, urban, rural, fire-based, and third service. EMS crews used their regular equipment and were required to carry out all the steps to administer a drug dose. Two evaluators scored crew performance via direct observation and video review. An error was defined as 20% difference compared to the weight-appropriate dose. Descriptive statistics were utilized. Results: A total of 142 simulations were completed. The majority of crews were (58.3%) Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic (EMTP)/EMTP. For the cardiac arrest scenario, 51/70 (72.9%; 95% CI: 60.9%, 82.8%) epinephrine doses were correct. There were 6 (8.6%, 95% CI: 2.0%, 15.1%) 10-fold overdoses and one (1.4%; 95% CI: -1.4%, 4.2%), 10-fold under dose. In the seizure scenario, 28/50 (56.0%; 95% CI: 42.2%, 69.8%) benzodiazepine doses were correct; 6/18 (33.3%; 95% CI: 11.5%, 55.1%) drug dilutions were incorrect resulting in dosing errors. Unrecognized air was frequently entrained into the administration syringe resulting in under doses. Overall, 31.2% (95% CI: 25.5%, 36.6%) of drug doses were incorrect. Obtaining an incorrect weight led to a drug dosing error in 18/142 (12.7%, 95% CI: 7.2%, 18.2%) cases. Errors of omission included failure to check blood sugar in the seizure scenario and failure to administer epinephrine and a fluid bolus in anaphylactic shock. Conclusion: Despite implementation of a PDR, dosing errors, including 10-fold errors, still occur at a high rate. Errors occur with dilution and length-based tape use. Further error reduction strategies, beyond a PDR and that target errors of omission, are needed for pediatric prehospital drug administration.