Standard versus accelerated riboflavin-ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion.

Standard versus accelerated riboflavin-ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.004
复制
发表时间:
2015-09
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Meek KM
Meek KM
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aldahlawi NH;Hayes S;O'Brart DP;Meek KM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

检测标准和加速角膜胶原交联(CXL)对角膜酶抗性的影响。英国卡迪夫,卡迪夫大学视光学和视觉科学学院。实验研究。将66只摘除的猪眼(去除角膜上皮)分为6组。第1组未接受治疗,第2组接受右旋糖酐滴眼液,第3至6组接受核黄素/右旋糖酐滴眼液。第4组接受标准CXL(3 mW/cm 2紫外线A照射30分钟),而第5组和第6组接受加速CXL(分别为9 mW/cm 2照射10分钟和18 mW/cm 2照射5分钟)。对每个角膜的中心8.0 mm环钻纽扣进行胃蛋白酶消化。每天测量角膜直径,消化12天后记录每组5个样本的干重。所有CXL组(4 - 6)消化时间更长,12天时干重更大(P < .0001),而非辐照组(1 - 3)(P < .0001)。完全消化所需的时间在标准和加速CXL组之间没有差异,但12天时的干重在处理之间显示出显著差异:标准CXL 3 mW >加速CXL 9 mW >加速CXL 18 mW(P < .0001)。标准和加速CXL均增加角膜酶抗性;然而,当使用加速CXL时,CXL的量可能较少。预防疾病进展所需的CXL的精确量尚不清楚。没有作者在提到的任何材料或方法中拥有经济或所有权利益。
To examine the effect of standard and accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) on corneal enzymatic resistance. School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Experimental study. Sixty-six enucleated porcine eyes (with corneal epithelium removed) were assigned to 6 groups. Group 1 remained untreated, group 2 received dextran eyedrops, and groups 3 to 6 received riboflavin/dextran eyedrops. Group 4 had standard CXL (3 mW/cm2 ultraviolet-A for 30 minutes), whereas groups 5 and 6 received accelerated CXL (9 mW/cm2 for 10 minutes and 18 mW/cm2 for 5 minutes, respectively). Trephined central 8.0 mm buttons from each cornea underwent pepsin digestion. Corneal diameter was measured daily, and the dry weight of 5 samples from each group was recorded after 12 days of digestion. All CXL groups (4 to 6) took longer to digest and had a greater dry weight at 12 days (P < .0001) than the nonirradiated groups (1 to 3) (P < .0001). The time taken for complete digestion to occur did not differ between the standard and accelerated CXL groups, but the dry weights at 12 days showed significant differences between treatments: standard CXL 3 mW > accelerated CXL 9 mW > accelerated CXL 18 mW (P < .0001). Standard and accelerated CXL both increased corneal enzymatic resistance; however, the amount of CXL might be less when accelerated CXL is used. The precise amount of CXL needed to prevent disease progression is not yet known. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.