Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Transitions, Resilience and Governance: Linking Technological, Ecological and Political Systems The Politics of Social-ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio- technical Transitions
Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Transitions, Resilience and Governance: Linking Technological, Ecological and Political Systems The Politics of Social-ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio- technical Transitions
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Adrian Smith;A. Stirling
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adrian Smith;A. Stirling
以技术为重点的社会技术转型文献分享了社会生态系统研究的一些复杂系统的敏感性。我们认为，在这些研究领域之间分享经验教训必须特别注意两种方法所面临的共同治理挑战。在这里，我们专注于关键的经验所产生的反应过渡管理方法来管理可持续的社会技术变革。关于谁来治理，谁的系统框架计算，以及谁的可持续性得到优先考虑的问题都与社会生态系统研究有关。我们的结论是，在这两个领域的未来研究应处理更集中，更明确地与这些固有的政治层面的可持续性。
Technology-focused literature on socio-technical transitions shares some of the complex systems sensibilities of social-ecological systems research. We contend that the sharing of lessons between these areas of study must attend particularly to the common governance challenges that confront both approaches. Here, we focus on critical experience arising from reactions to a transition management approach to governing sustainable socio-technical transformations. Questions over who governs, whose system framings count, and whose sustainability gets prioritized are all pertinent to social-ecological systems research. We conclude that future research in both areas should deal more centrally and explicitly with these inherently political dimensions of sustainability.