Test-Retest Reliability and Minimum Difference Values of a Novel and Portable Upright Row Strength Assessment in Probation Officers.
Test-Retest Reliability and Minimum Difference Values of a Novel and Portable Upright Row Strength Assessment in Probation Officers.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph20032236
复制
发表时间：
2023-01-27
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ryan, Eric D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Buoncristiani, Nicholas A;Mota, Jacob A;Gerstner, Gena R;Giuliani-Dewig, Hayden K;Ryan, Eric D
上肢力量对于执法人员的职业任务和伤害预防非常重要。需要进行便携、可靠和具有成本效益的评估，以审查实地环境中低地轨道国家之间的UB强度。摘要本研究旨在探讨一种新颖且可携式的等长直立行评量量表，在缓刑犯管教人员中的重测信度与最小差异值。30名认证的缓刑监督官（18名女性;年龄= 38.9 ± 9.0岁，体重= 98.8 ± 27.1 kg，身高= 171.4 ± 14.0 cm）自愿参加本调查。在两个阶段（间隔2-5天）进行现场检测。参与者站在铝板上，链条连接到手柄和测力计上。他们在脐下两厘米处用旋前握法抓住手柄，并进行三次等长最大自主收缩。计算组内相关系数（ICC 2，1），测量标准误（SEM）和MD值。结果表明，各阶段无显著系统误差（p = 0.080）。UB强度的ICC 2、1、SEM和MD值分别为0.984、27.20 N（平均值的4.1%）和75.38 N（平均值的11.3%）。这些数据表明，这种等距直立行评估是一种可靠、便携和具有成本效益的UB强度测量方法，可用于评估和监测实地环境中的低地球轨道。
Upper body (UB) strength is important for occupational tasks and injury prevention in law enforcement officers (LEOs). Portable, reliable, and cost-effective assessments are needed to examine UB strength among LEOs in field settings. The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability and minimum difference (MD) values of a novel and portable isometric upright row assessment in probation officers. Thirty certified probation officers (18 women; age = 38.9 ± 9.0 years, body mass = 98.8 ± 27.1 kg, stature = 171.4 ± 14.0 cm) volunteered for this investigation. Testing occurred on-site across two sessions (2–5 days apart). Participants stood upon an aluminum plate with a chain attached to a handle and dynamometer. They grasped the handle with a pronated grip, two cm below the umbilicus, and performed three isometric maximal voluntary contractions. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), standard error of the measurement (SEM), and MD values were calculated. Results indicated no significant systematic error (p = 0.080) across sessions. The ICC2,1, SEM, and MD values for UB strength were 0.984, 27.20 N (4.1% of the mean), and 75.38 N (11.3% of the mean), respectively. These data suggest this isometric upright row assessment is a reliable, portable, and cost-effective measure of UB strength to assess and monitor LEOs in field settings.