Developing Metrics and Scoring Procedures to Support Mitigation Grant Program Decisionmaking
Developing Metrics and Scoring Procedures to Support Mitigation Grant Program Decisionmaking
复制标题
制定指标和评分程序以支持缓解拨款计划决策
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Dixon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Mendelsohn;Grant Johnson;K. Klima;Rachel Steratore;Samantha Cohen;G. Kirkwood;L. Dixon
关键发现间接效益线发现，投入产出（I-O）和可计算一般均衡（CGE）是两个最广泛接受的建模策略，用于估计减灾的经济效益·虽然每种类型的模型包含一定的优点和缺点，I-O模型是最实用的短期选择，用于估计减灾的经济效益。·间接效益一行提供了如何使用投入产出方法建立经济效益模型的详细说明。联邦紧急事务管理局委托开发的指标，可以告知决策授予灾前减灾赠款。作者建立了三条努力线（LoE）进行分析：间接效益，申请机构能力和社区弹性。每个LoE都产生了一个度量或框架，可以支持赠款决策和计划绩效评估。制定评估和评分程序以支持缓解赠款计划决策
KEY FINDINGS The indirect benefits line found that input-output (I-O) and computable general equilibrium (CGE) are the two most widely accepted modeling strategies for estimating the economic benefits of hazard mitigation • Although each type of model contains certain advantages and disadvantages, I-O models are the most practical near-term option for estimating the economic benefits of hazard mitigation. • The indirect benefits line provides detailed instructions for how to model economic benefits using an I-O approach. The Federal Emergency Management Agency commissioned development of metrics that can inform decisionmaking for awarding predisaster mitigation grants. The authors established three lines of effort (LoEs) for analysis: indirect benefits, applicant institutional capability, and community resilience. Each LoE produced a metric or framework that could support grant decisionmaking and program performance evaluation. Developing Metrics and Scoring Procedures to Support Mitigation Grant Program Decisionmaking