Public Administration and the Modern State

Public Administration and the Modern State
复制标题

公共行政与现代国家

DOI:
10.1057/9781137437495_15
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Corkin J
Corkin J
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Corkin J

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

过去,期刊上充斥着分析欧洲一体化进程的文章,现在则充斥着分析欧盟作为一个治理体系的文章。本章结合了这些主题,认为要理解欧盟目前的一体化进程,就必须将欧盟理解为一个治理体系。更具体地说,它问政府间和新功能主义的传统,其中每一个属性的制度(transmits)的形成,在欧盟特定的政治原则的偏好,最终忽视了他们所选择的机构代理人-社区的专业知识-对自己的(transmits)形成的影响。从制度主义的角度来看,本章提出的问题是,这些专业知识群体虽然成功地融入了欧盟现有的制度架构,但是否也带来了自己的内部实践。
Where journals were once full of articles analyzing the process of European integration, they are now full of articles analyzing the EU as a system of governance. This chapter combines these themes, arguing that to understand the process by which the EU is now integrating it has become necessary to understand the EU as a system of governance. More particularly, it asks whether intergovernmental and neofunctionalist traditions, each of which attributes institutional (trans)formations in the EU to the preferences of particular political principals, end up neglecting the impact that their chosen institutional agents — communities of expertise — have on their own (trans)formation. In an institutionalist bent, this chapter asks whether these communities of expertise, successful as they are at embedding themselves in the EU’s existing institutional architecture, also bring their own internal practices to bear upon it.