'Distinctiveness' and programme diversity in public broadcasting revisited: A seven-country comparison
'Distinctiveness' and programme diversity in public broadcasting revisited: A seven-country comparison
复制标题
重新审视公共广播的“独特性”和节目多样性：七个国家的比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
0.4
通讯作者：
M. Opgenhaffen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jonathan Hendrickx;T. Raats;Heritiana Ranaivoson;M. Opgenhaffen
摘要在过去的十年中，公共服务广播公司一直面临着重大变化，影响他们的职权范围，投资组合和融资。在削减开支和竞争加剧的严重推动下，关于“独特性”的讨论再次浮出水面，并占据了中心地位。
在许多关于公共广播服务合法性的政策讨论中。本文批判性地将公共服务广播中关于体裁和体裁多样性的更广泛的学术工作中关于独特性的讨论置于语境中。它提出了一个比较，定量的调查结果，
对七家公共广播公司（弗兰德斯、芬兰、德国、匈牙利、冰岛、葡萄牙和联合王国）的节目安排进行了研究。这篇文章讨论了关于独特性的讨论如何进入关于体裁多样性和公共娱乐量的更广泛的讨论
我们会研究如何评估及比较不同广播机构的类别节目的多样性，以及特定类别节目（例如娱乐节目）的高水平与选定公共广播机构的其他表现指标之间的关系。文章
根据由大量国家和大量具有代表性的节目组成的原始数据库，提供了类型输出的一致比较，并采用了一套一致的指数，不仅评估娱乐的份额，而且评估节目的多样性。
这篇文章的根本问题是在何种程度上类型仍然是有价值的衡量公共服务广播的性能和合法性，考虑到测量的困难“类型”作为代理的公共服务媒体（PSM）的有效性。
Abstract In the past decade, public service broadcasters have been confronted with major shifts affecting their remit, portfolio and financing. Heavily fuelled by cutbacks and increasing competition, discussions on 'distinctiveness' have resurfaced again and stand central
in many policy discussions on the legitimacy of public service broadcasting. This article critically contextualizes discussions on distinctiveness within broader scholarly work on genre and genre diversity in public service broadcasting. It presents the findings of a comparative, quantitative
study of the programming schedule of seven public broadcasters (Flanders, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Portugal and the United Kingdom). The article addresses how discussions on distinctiveness tap into broader discussions on genre diversity and the amount of entertainment in public
service broadcasting programming, how we can assess and compare the diversity of genre programming across different broadcasters, and to what extent high levels of specific genres such as entertainment can be linked to other performance indicators of the selected public broadcasters. The article
provides a consistent comparison of genre outputs, based on an original database made of a large set of countries and a high, representative number of programmes and applies a consistent set of indexes to assess not only the share of entertainment but also the diversity of the programming.
The underlying question to this article is to what extent genre is still valuable to measure performance and legitimacy of public service broadcasting, considering difficulties of measuring 'genre' as proxy for public service media's (PSM) effectiveness.