Public harm or public value? Towards coproduction in research with communities
Public harm or public value? Towards coproduction in research with communities
复制标题
DOI：
10.1068/c12116
复制
发表时间：
2015-06-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Richardson, Liz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Beebeejaun, Yasminah;Durose, Catherine;Richardson, Liz
本文对当前的研究治理伦理模式提出了批评，这种模式将社区视为弱势主体。本文构建了一种替代方法来思考研究治理和反思性研究实践的双重挑战，通过重构公共价值的想法和拒绝公共伤害模型。我们使用共同制作的见解作为一种积极反思研究人员和“被研究者”之间关系的方式，以创造思考公共价值的新方式。我们认为，自反性的研究实践应该借鉴的原则和治理内的授权的例子。他们渴望与社区合作，为社区在定义和创造有价值的研究方面的更大控制创造空间。
This paper develops a critique of the current model of research governance ethics which casts communities as vulnerable subjects. The paper constructs an alternative approach to thinking about the twin challenges of research governance and reflexive research practice through reframing ideas of public value and rejecting a public harm model. We use the insights of coproduction as a way of positively rethinking the relationship between researchers and 'the researched' to create new ways of thinking about public value. We argue that reflexive research practice should draw upon the principles and examples of empowerment within governance. These aspire to work 'with' communities and create space for greater community control in defining and creating publically valuable research.