Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Culture, ideology, and strategic framing

Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Culture, ideology, and strategic framing
复制标题

社会运动的比较视角:文化、意识形态和战略框架

DOI:
10.1017/cbo9780511803987.013
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
M. Zald
M. Zald
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Zald

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

最近对不公正和不满的战略框架、其原因、动机以及集体行动的相关模板的关注,再次强调了思想和文化元素在理解动员参与社会运动和构建政治机会方面的核心重要性。虽然将文化和框架视为战略性产生代表着与过去运动中思想观念的重大决裂,过去的运动往往强调其嵌入社区并日益涌现,但战略框架的概念在其组成要素和一般过程方面仍然相当模糊。第三部分的引言首先关注学术学术中思想和文化分析的更大演变,以及它在社会运动研究中所涉及(或不涉及)的情况。近几十年来,文化、框架和剧本、修辞和戏剧、文化剧目和工具包等分析模式的出现,大大增强了我们分析文化、意识形态和框架在社会运动中的作用的能力。关于社会运动中的文化和框架的文献有些无定形。我概述了运动、框架和更大社会相互作用的六个基本主题。首先论述争剧目和框架的文化建构。其次,由于框架发生在更大的社会进程的背景下,我讨论了文化矛盾和历史事件在为框架提供机会方面的贡献。
The recent focus on the strategic framing of injustice and grievances, their causes, motivations, and associated templates for collective action, has served to reemphasize the central importance of ideas and cultural elements in understanding the mobilization of participation in social movements and the framing of political opportunity. While conceiving of culture and framing as strategically produced represents a substantial break with past conceptions of ideas in movements, which tended to emphasize their embeddedness in community and as crescively emergent, still the notion of strategic framing is quite vague in terms of its constituent elements and general processes. This introduction to Part III focuses first on the larger evolution of the analysis of ideas and culture in academic scholarship and as it was entailed (or not) in the study of social movements. Recent decades have seen the emergence of modes of analysis of culture, of frames and scripts, of rhetoric and dramaturgy, and of cultural repertoires and tool kits that substantially enhance our ability to analyze the role of culture, ideology, and frames in social movements. The literature on culture and framing in social movements has been somewhat amorphous. I sketch six basic topics in the interplay of movements, framing, and the larger society. First, I discuss the cultural construction of repertoires of contention and frames . Second, since framing takes place in the context of larger societal processes, I discuss the contribution of cultural contradictions and historical events in providing opportunities for framing.