Provenance research by INAA on ancient Chinese white porcelain excavated from the Maojiawan site of Beijing
Provenance research by INAA on ancient Chinese white porcelain excavated from the Maojiawan site of Beijing
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.030
复制
发表时间：
2013-03
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Li Li-Li;Guoxi Xie;S. Feng;Xiangqian Feng;Ling-tong Yan;Ji-hao Zhu;Yongqiang Li;Hongye Han
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Li Li-Li;Guoxi Xie;S. Feng;Xiangqian Feng;Ling-tong Yan;Ji-hao Zhu;Yongqiang Li;Hongye Han
2005年9月，北京毛家湾坑出土了100多万件中国古代瓷器碎片。在这些碎片中，鉴定出四种中国古代白瓷。考古学家根据类型学准确地确定了其中三种瓷器的年代和来源。然而，不同的考古学家对其他/第四种类型的解释不同。根据瓷体的颜色，很容易确定它是明代景德镇窑（公元1368-1644年）的产物。然而，根据容器形状，这第四种瓷器也被确定为元代（公元1271-1368年）磁州窑的产品。为了确定这一类型的中国古代白瓷的来源，我们选择了在现场鉴定的四种白瓷中的131块碎片作为实验样品，并通过仪器中子活化分析（INAA）进行了分析。经主成分分析和地球化学分析对实验数据进行处理，结果表明该型中国古代白瓷为景德镇，而非磁州窑。
More than one million shards of ancient Chinese porcelain were excavated at the Maojiawan pit in Beijing in September 2005. Among these shards, four types of ancient Chinese white porcelain were identified. The ages and provenances of three of these types of porcelain were accurately determined by archaeologists based on typology. However, different archaeologists interpreted the other/fourth type differently. According to the colour of the porcelain body, it was easily identified as the product of the Jingdezhen kilns of the Ming dynasty (1368–1644 AD). However, based on the vessel shape, this fourth type of porcelain was also identified as the product of the Cizhou kilns of the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368 AD). In order to determine the provenance of this type of ancient Chinese white porcelain, 131 shards comprising the four types of white porcelain identified at the site were selected as experimental specimens and analysed by Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA). After the processing of experimental data by principal component analysis and geochemical analysis, the results show that the provenance of this type of ancient Chinese white porcelain is the Jingdezhen, not the Cizhou kiln.