THE DEVELOPMENT, VALIDITY, AND RELIABILITY OF THE OARS MULTIDIMENSIONAL FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
THE DEVELOPMENT, VALIDITY, AND RELIABILITY OF THE OARS MULTIDIMENSIONAL FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/geronj/36.4.428
复制
发表时间：
1981-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
SMYER, MA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FILLENBAUM, GG;SMYER, MA
概述了OARS [美国老年人资源和服务]多维功能评估问卷A部分的开发、有效性和可靠性。A部分允许对个人在5个方面（社会、经济、心理健康、身体健康和自我保健能力）的每一个方面的功能进行评估;每个方面的详细信息都以6分制的评定量表进行总结。内容和合意的有效性通过构建的方式得到保证。标准有效性的信息，除了社会的所有维度。使用的标准及其相关的肯德尔Tau值如下：客观经济量表（0.62）;基于老年精神病学家（0.60）、医生助理（0.82）和物理治疗师（0.89）的个人访谈的评级。对于11个地理上分散的研究和临床设置的评分者，组内相关系数，基于30名受试者，从0.66的身体健康到0.87的自我护理能力; 74%的评分完全一致，24%的差异为1点。
Development, validity and reliability of part A of the OARS [Older Americans'' Resources and Services] Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire is outlined. Part A permits assessment of individuals'' functioning on each of 5 dimensions (social, economic, mental health, physical health and self-care capacity); the detailed information in each area is summarized on a 6-point rating scale. Content and consensual validity were ensured by the manner of construction. Information on criterion validity was obtained for all dimensions except social. The criteria used and their associated Kendall''s Tau values were as follows: an objective economic scale (0.62); ratings based on personal interviews by geropsychiatrists (0.60); physician''s associates; (0.82) and physical therapists (0.89). For 11 geographically dispersed raters from research and clinic settings, intraclass correlational coefficients, based on 30 subjects, ranged from 0.66 on physical health to 0.87 in self-care capacity; 74% of the ratings were in complete agreement and 24% differed by 1 point.