The 2020 FASEB Science Research Conference on Translational Neuroimmunology: From Mechanisms to Therapeutics, June 29-30, 2020.
The 2020 FASEB Science Research Conference on Translational Neuroimmunology: From Mechanisms to Therapeutics, June 29-30, 2020.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1096/fj.202002065
复制
发表时间:
2020-11
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Segal BM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lane TE;Segal BM
The Translational Neuroimmunology Conference: From Mechanisms to Therapeutics was held June 29-30. This meeting was FASEB’s first SRC that was conducted via a fully virtual format, consequent to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was originally scheduled to be held on July 19-22 at the Babson Executive Conference (Babson, MA. USA), before FASEB leadership made the difficult decision to cancel all in-person SRCs through the summer and strongly encouraged organizers to conduct virtual conferences. When we were asked to organize the first virtual conference, we were initially concerned about changes to scientific content, mode of presentation, and opportunities for interactions between the session chairs, speakers and audience. Nevertheless, we decided to proceed, in light of the importance of1Correspondence: Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; tlane@ uci. edu. Author contributions: TE Lane and BM Segal equally contributed to the overall design and content editing of this report. Dr. Cohen led off the meeting with an outstanding state-of-the-art overview of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the human demyelinating disease MS. He addressed several issues related to unmet needs for patients with MS. One question concerned whether it is more beneficial to treat newly diagnosed patients with highly potent DMTs that carry higher risks, as opposed to initiating less potent but safer drugs and escalating as needed. Available DMTs for patients with the relapsing-remitting form of MS are not as effective in progressive MS, and do not promote repair of the damaged CNS nor functional recovery. Dr. Cohen’s talk concluded by indicating that continuing efforts are needed to develop better methods for evaluating both disease activity and treatment responses in patients with both relapsing and progressive forms of disease.