The Cramer-Rao inequality for star bodies
The Cramer-Rao inequality for star bodies
复制标题
DOI:
10.1215/s0012-9074-02-11212-5
复制
发表时间:
2002-03
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
E. Lutwak;Deane Yang;Gaoyong Zhang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Lutwak;Deane Yang;Gaoyong Zhang
Associated with each body K in Euclidean n-space R is an ellipsoid Γ2K called the Legendre ellipsoid of K. It can be defined as the unique ellipsoid centered at the body’s center of mass such that the ellipsoid’s moment of inertia about any axis passing through the center of mass is the same as that of the body. In an earlier paper the authors showed that corresponding to each convex body K ⊂ R is a new ellipsoid Γ−2K that is in some sense dual to the Legendre ellipsoid. The Legendre ellipsoid is an object of the dual Brunn–Minkowski theory, while the new ellipsoid Γ−2K is the corresponding object of the Brunn–Minkowski theory. The present paper has two aims. The first is to show that the domain of Γ−2 can be extended to star-shaped sets. The second is to prove that the following relationship exists between the two ellipsoids: If K is a star shaped set, then Γ−2K ⊂ Γ2K, with equality if and only if K is an ellipsoid centered at the origin. This inclusion is the geometric analogue of one of the basic inequalities of information theory – the Cramer-Rao inequality. Associated with each body K in Euclidean n-space R is an ellipsoid Γ2K called the Legendre ellipsoid of K. The Legendre ellipsoid is a basic concept from classical mechanics. It can be defined as the unique ellipsoid centered at the body’s center of mass such that the ellipsoid’s moment of inertia about any axis passing through the center of mass is the same as that of the body. In [26] the authors showed that corresponding to each convex body K ⊂ R is a new ellipsoid Γ−2K. The results in this paper hint at a remarkable duality between this new ellipsoid and the Legendre ellipsoid. The present paper has two aims. The first is to show that the domain of Γ−2 can be extended to star-shaped sets. The second is to prove that the following relationship exists between the two ellipsoids: If K is a star shaped set, then (1) Γ−2K ⊂ Γ2K, with equality if and only if K is an ellipsoid centered at the origin. This inclusion is the geometric analogue of one of the basic inequalities of information theory – the Cramer-Rao inequality. The Brunn-Minkowski theory (often called the theory of mixed volumes) is the heart of analytic convex geometry. Many of the fundamental ingredients of the theory were developed by Minkowski a century ago. Schneider’s book [28] is the classical reference for the subject. Over the years the tools of the Brunn-Minkowski theory have proven to be remarkably effective in solving inverse problems for which the data involves projections of convex bodies. A quarter of a century ago, the elements of a dual Brunn-Minkowski theory were introduced in [22] (and related papers). The basic idea of the dual theory is to replace the projections 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 52A40, 94A17. 1 2 ERWIN LUTWAK, DEANE YANG, AND GAOYONG ZHANG of the Brunn-Minkowski theory with intersections. In [23] it was shown that there is in fact a “dictionary” between the theories. Not only do concepts like the “elementary mixed volumes” of the classical theory become the “elementary dual mixed volumes” of the dual theory, but even objects such as the “projection bodies” of the Brunn-Minkowski theory have dual counterparts, “intersection bodies”, in the dual theory. In fact, it was this dual notion of “intersection body” that played a key role in the ultimate solution of the Busemann-Petty problem (see e.g. Gardner [11, 12, 13], Zhang [29, 30], Koldobsky [17, 18, 19, 20], Gardner, Koldobsky, and Schlumprecht [15]). Gardner’s book on geometric tomography [14] is an excellent reference for the interplay between the classical and dual theories. Minkowski showed that what was to become known as the Brunn-Minkowski theory could be developed naturally by combining the notion of volume with an addition of convex bodies now known as Minkowski addition. In the early 1960’s, Firey [9] introduced and studied an Lp generalization of Minkowski addition. In the 1990’s, in [24, 25], these Minkowski-Firey Lp-sums were combined with the notion of volume to form embryonic Lp versions of the Brunn-Minkowski theory. It is easily seen that the classical Legendre ellipsoid belongs to the dual Brunn-Minkowski theory. This observation led the authors to the obvious question: What is the dual analog of the Legendre ellipsoid in the Brunn-Minkowski theory? The answer was given by the new ellipsoid introduced in [26]. This new ellipsoid actually belongs to the L2-Brunn-Minkowski theory. The nature of the duality between the Brunn-Minkowski theory and the dual BrunnMinkowski theory is not understood. The objects of study of the Brunn-Minkowski theory are convex bodies, while the objects of study of the dual Brunn-Minkowski theory are star bodies. The basic functionals of the Brunn-Minkowski theory are often expressed as integrals involving the support and curvature functions. The basic functionals of the dual BrunnMinkowski theory are integrals involving radial functions. A first step in understanding the nature of the duality between the Brunn-Minkowski theory and its dual is to extend some of the functionals of the Brunn-Minkowski theory so that they are defined for star bodies (rather than convex bodies) and to provide new definitions of these functionals that involve only radial functions (rather than support and curvature functions). In this article, this first step is accomplished for one object of the Brunn-Minkowski theory: the Γ−2-ellipsoid. One of the central problems in information theory is how to extract useful information from noisy signals. Let x0 ∈ R be the transmitted signal. A simple model for the received signal is a random vector x ∈ R with a probability distribution p(x− x0) dx on R, where the probability measure p(x) dx has mean 0. Suppose that the same signal is transmitted repeatedly and that x1, . . . , xN are the received signals. What is the best estimate for the transmitted signal, and what is the error of this estimate? One possible estimate is the mean x = x1 + · · ·+ xN N . By the central limit theorem, as N becomes large, the distribution of the random variable x approaches a Gaussian with mean x0 and covariance matrix C/ √ N , where the matrix C is given by Cij = ∫