Ruling Russia: Authoritarianism from the Revolution to Putin
Ruling Russia: Authoritarianism from the Revolution to Putin
复制标题
统治俄罗斯：从革命到普京的威权主义
DOI：
10.1080/10848770.2018.1449403
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kenneth M. Wilson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kenneth M. Wilson
贡献者-迈克尔·法根布拉特，安德鲁·鲍伊，卡斯滕·哈里斯，尤其是多纳泰拉·迪·凯撒-描绘得如此敏锐。对于民族主义的海德格尔来说，犹太人是不受欢迎的“国际主义者”，他们没有根，流离失所，“没有信仰”，因此是德国人寻求“另一个开始”的模糊定义的形而上学障碍。在这个问题上不可能有最后的定论，但格雷戈里·弗里德的贡献《国王死了》是一个绰绰有余的替代品。弗里德详细讨论了海德格尔似乎在鼓吹（1933年）“彻底消灭”一个只能是欧洲犹太人的隐藏敌人的一段话。弗里德对此轻描淡写的回应是，“很难知道如何处理敢于发表这种声明的哲学”（54）。可以做的一件事是记住，正如哲学家死去一样，他们的工作也会死去。弗里德写道：
contributors—Michael Fagenblat, Andrew Bowie, Karsten Harries and, especially, Donatella Di Cesare—delineate so acutely. For the nationalistic Heidegger, the Jews are undesirable “internationalists,” rootless, displaced, and “worldless,” hence a metaphysical hindrance to the Germans in their vaguely defined quest for an “other beginning.” There can be no last word on the subject, but Gregory Fried’s contribution, “The King Is Dead,” serves as a more than adequate substitute. Fried discusses at length a passage in which Heidegger seems to be advocating (in 1933) the “total annihilation” of a hidden enemy that can only be the European Jews. Fried’s understated response to this is that “it can be hard to know what to do with a philosophy that would dare such pronouncements” (54). One thing that can be done is to remember that, just as philosophers die, so too can their work. Fried writes: