The gray zones of privatized imaging.
The gray zones of privatized imaging.
复制标题
私有化成像的灰色地带。
DOI:
10.1080/15265160802716845
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Illes,Judy
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lau,PatriciaW;Illes,Judy
Private imaging is an ever-growing industry. As Burger and Kass (2009) describe, one does not have to look far to find signs of this trend in the United States where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans are available to the private consumer for a variety of uses. Companies offer a wide range of health-related services including diagnostic and screening imaging, and still scientifically questionable nonmedical services such as lie detection (Greely and Illes 2007; Simpson 2008). As Illes and colleagues (2003), Kalish and colleagues (2004) and Racine and Illes (2008) previously reported, self-referred whole body CT screenings, for example, are readily available to the’healthy wealthy’American consumer who is able to walk in off the street and purchase scans at will. North of the border, there is also a growing private medical imaging market with services available to paying Canadian consumers across the country. The Canadian Institute for Health Information (Ottawa, Canada) recently published a report (Canadian Institute for Health Information 2008) that showed the increasing number of private MRI, CT, and positron emission tomography (PET) scanners available to the private consumer. However, despite the growing trend, much stricter rules apply to buying a scan in Canada. We (Lau and Illes 2009, unpublished data [manuscript in preparation,“A Spectrum of Ethics Challenges for Privatized Imaging”]) looked at the practices of 85% of these companies that advertise on Internet. We found that 97%(n= 28) require a physician referral for any service provided. Only one company allows patients to self-refer, with self-referral restricted to heart or lung CT screening scans, and only to customers who fit a standard set of criteria for age, health, and previous scan history. By far, the