School-based prevention of depressive symptoms:: A randomized controlled study of the effectiveness and specificity of the Penn Resiliency Program
School-based prevention of depressive symptoms:: A randomized controlled study of the effectiveness and specificity of the Penn Resiliency Program
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-006x.75.1.9
复制
发表时间：
2007-02-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Seligman, Martin E. P.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gillham, Jane E.;Reivich, Karen J.;Seligman, Martin E. P.
作者调查了宾夕法尼亚大学弹性计划（PRP; J.E.吉勒姆湖H. Jaycox，K. J. Reivich，M. E. P. Seligman，& T.银，1990），认知行为抑郁症预防计划。来自3所中学的儿童（N = 697）被随机分配到PRP，对照组（CON）或宾夕法尼亚州增强计划（PEP; K。J. Reivich，1996; A. J. Shatte，1997），控制非特异性干预成分的替代干预。通过3年的随访评估儿童的抑郁症状。在整个样本中，对抑郁症状的平均水平没有干预作用。结果因学校而异。在2所学校中，PRP在随访期间相对于CON和PEP显着减少了抑郁症状。在第三所学校，PRP并没有预防抑郁症状。作者讨论了与先前关于PRP的研究和预防计划的传播有关的发现。
The authors investigated the effectiveness and specificity of the Penn Resiliency Program (PRP; J. E. Gillham, L. H. Jaycox, K. J. Reivich, M. E. P. Seligman, & T. Silver, 1990), a cognitive-behavioral depression prevention program. Children (N = 697) from 3 middle schools were randomly assigned to PRP, Control (CON), or the Penn Enhancement Program (PEP; K. J. Reivich,1996; A. J. Shatte, 1997), an alternate intervention that controls for nonspecific intervention ingredients. Children's depressive symptoms were assessed through 3 years of follow-up. There was no intervention effect on average levels of depressive symptoms in the full sample. Findings varied by school. In 2 schools, PRP significantly reduced depressive symptoms across the follow-up relative to both CON and PEP. In the 3rd school, PRP did not prevent depressive symptoms. The authors discuss the findings in relation to previous research on PRP and the dissemination of prevention programs.