Trends in the prevalence and ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed diabetes according to obesity levels in the U.S
Trends in the prevalence and ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed diabetes according to obesity levels in the U.S
复制标题
DOI:
10.2337/diacare.27.12.2806
复制
发表时间:
2004-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
16.2
通讯作者:
Vinicor, F
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gregg, EW;Cadwell, BL;Vinicor, F
OBJECTIVE - To examine trends in the prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and the proportion of total cases previously diagnosed, according to obesity status in the U.S. over the past 40 years.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We assembled data from five consecutive cross-sectional national surveys: National Health Examination Survey I (1960-1962), National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I (1971-1974), NHANES II (1976-1980), NHANES III (1988-1994), and NHANES 1999-2000. Diagnosed diabetes was ascertained, and height and weight were measured in adults aged 20-74 years in all surveys. In NHANES II, NHANES III, and NHANES 1999-2000, a fasting glucose level greater than or equal to126 mg/dl was used to identify cases among individuals not reporting diabetes. Design-based analyses and Bayesian models estimate the probability that prevalence of diabetes increased within four BMI groups (99.9%) were accompanied by nonsignificant increases in undiagnosed diabetes (2.0-2.4%, 66.6%). This resulted in an increase in total diabetes (5.3 8.2%, >99.9%) and a modest nonsignificant increase in the proportion of cases that were diagnosed (62-70%, 62.4%). However, these trends varied considerably by BMI level. In individuals with BMI greater than or equal to35 kg/m(2), diagnosed diabetes increased markedly (from 4.9% in 1960, to 8.6% during 1976-1980, to 15.1% in 1999-2000; probability >99.9%), whereas undiagnosed diabetes declined considerably (12.5% during 1976-1980 to 3.2% in 1999-2000, probability of increase 4.5%) Therefore, the proportion of total diabetes cases that were diagnosed increased from 41 to 83% (probability 99.9%) among individuals with BMI greater than or equal to35 kg/m(2). By comparison, changes in prevalence within BMI strata