Progressive home rule?
Progressive home rule?
复制标题
进步的家庭统治?
DOI:
10.1111/newe.12221
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Wyn Jones R
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wyn Jones R
The establishment in 1999 of what is now formally known as the Senedd, or Welsh parliament, was the culmination of a century and more of argument in favour of what used to be known–more pleasingly, we suggest–as ‘home rule’. While the intensity of agitation ebbed and flowed over that extended period, one constant was that the arguments in favour of devolution were almost exclusively associated with the progressive side of politics. Not all progressives in Wales supported devolution, of course. Neil Kinnock, for example, was probably the most effective opponent at the time of the 1979 referendum, and his views do not appear to have shifted much in the interim. But with remarkably few exceptions, advocates of home rule have tended to be progressives who have all envisaged the establishment of a Welsh parliament and government as a means to progressive political ends.This, in turn, reflects the ways in which the particular trajectory of Welsh social and political history has served to intertwine national and class narratives in ways that have underpinned perhaps the longest period of progressive/centreleft electoral dominance ever seen: a hundred and fifty years plus and counting. Yet no matter how interesting the story of how we got here, given the umbilical link between progressive values and Welsh devolution, now also seems like an auspicious time to widen the optic and ask what lessons progressives outside Wales might learn from the experience of the past two decades.