From Products of Origin to Geographical Indications in Japan: Perspectives on the Construction of Quality for the Emblematic Productions of Kobe and Matsusaka Beef
From Products of Origin to Geographical Indications in Japan: Perspectives on the Construction of Quality for the Emblematic Productions of Kobe and Matsusaka Beef
复制标题
从日本原产地产品到地理标志：神户牛肉和松阪牛肉标志性产品的质量建设视角
DOI：
10.1057/9781137031907_8
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
K. Sekine
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Louis Augustin;K. Sekine
在世贸组织农业谈判紧张的背景下，地理标志（GI）受到激烈的讨价还价。欧美立场能否调和，不仅影响产品本身的未来，也影响整个地区的发展潜力和融入世界经济的方式。虽然地理标志得到关贸总协定/世贸组织马拉喀什协议（1994 年）的 TRIPS（与贸易有关的知识产权方面）组成部分的认可，1 但它们仍然是多种解释的对象。一般来说，政府的立场在采用（集体）商标制度和地理标志保护（PGI）制度之间摇摆不定。近年来，在《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》的推动下，这一争论又引起了新的参与者，尤其是在亚洲。 The new interest of Asian countries in GIs is not an unexpected one, as they play an important role in the international agro-food business.然而，由于地理标志在亚洲相对较新，各个经济体对地理标志的各自立场并不总是完全确定。许多国家仍在根据其签署的不同国际协议调整其国家法规，并对遵循的方向犹豫不决。但这也解释了为什么他们的态度如此根本：地理标志的实施方式可能会改变地理标志原则与商标原则之间不稳定的平衡。 2
In a context of tense agricultural negotiations at the WTO, Geographical Indications (GIs) are subject to intense bargaining. The way European and American standpoints can (or cannot) be conciliated affect the future of the products themselves, but also of the development potential of entire regions and the way they integrate into the world economy. While GIs are recognized by the TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights) component of the Marrakech agreements (1994) of the GATT/WTO, 1 they are still the object of multiple interpretations. Generally speaking, the positions of governments have oscillated between the adoption of a system of (collective) trademarks and one of Protected Geographical Indication (PGI). In recent years, stimulated by the TRIPS, the debate has reached new players, especially in Asia. The new interest of Asian countries in GIs is not an unexpected one, as they play an important role in the international agro-food business. Nevertheless, since GIs are relatively new in Asia, the respective positions of individual economies towards them are not always fully established. Many are still adapting their national regulations to the different international agreements they signed and have hesitated on the direction to follow. But that also explains why their attitude is so fundamental: the way in which GIs will be implemented is likely to modify the unstable balance between the tenets of the PGIs and those of the trademarks. 2
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ono Shigeaki;Kikegawa Takumi;Ikuya TOKORO＆ Kaori KAWAI
通讯作者：
Ikuya TOKORO＆ Kaori KAWAI