Inter-Rater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II)
Inter-Rater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/cpp.693
复制
发表时间：
2011-01-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Arntz, Arnoud
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lobbestael, Jill;Leurgans, Maartje;Arntz, Arnoud
本研究同时评估了评分者间的信度结构化临床访谈的诊断和统计手册的精神疾病轴I（SCID I）和轴II障碍（SCID II）的混合样本n = 151住院患者和门诊患者，和非患者对照。录音访谈由独立的第二评分者进行评估，第一评分者的评分和诊断是盲目的。对12种SCID I轴I疾病进行了分类评估者间可靠性评估，而对所有轴II疾病进行了分类和维度评估者间可靠性测试。结果显示，中度至优秀的评分者间协议的轴I障碍，而大多数分类和维度测量的人格障碍表现出良好的评分者间协议。版权所有（C）2010约翰威利父子有限公司
This study simultaneously assessed the inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Axis I (SCID I) and Axis II disorders (SCID II) in a mixed sample of n = 151 inpatients and outpatients, and non-patient controls. Audiotaped interviews were assessed by independent second raters blind for the first raters' scores and diagnoses. Categorical inter-rater reliability was assessed for 12 Axis I disorders of SCID I, while both categorical and dimensional inter-rater reliability was tested for all Axis II disorders. Results revealed moderate to excellent inter-rater agreement of the Axis I disorders, while most categorically and dimensionally measured personality disorders showed excellent inter-rater agreement. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.