Distinguishing unconscious from conscious cognition--reasonable assumptions and replicable findings: reply to Merikle and Reingold (1998) and Dosher (1998)
Distinguishing unconscious from conscious cognition--reasonable assumptions and replicable findings: reply to Merikle and Reingold (1998) and Dosher (1998)
复制标题
区分无意识与有意识认知——合理的假设和可复制的发现：对 Merikle 和 Reingold (1998) 以及 Dosher (1998) 的答复
DOI：
10.1037//0096-3445.127.3.320
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Draine,SC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Greenwald,AG;Draine,SC
Draine和Greenwald（1998）通过结合反应窗口程序和回归分析证明了可复制的无意识语义启动，反应窗口程序通过要求快速反应来增加启动效应，回归分析中的回归截距是无意识认知的标志。BA Dosher（1998）和PM Merikle和EM Reingold（1998）的评论对基于这些方法得出的结论提出了两个问题：（a）Draine和Greenwald（1998）在没有直接效应（即阈下启动词的可见性）的情况下证明了间接效应（阈下启动）吗？（B）Draine和Greenwald（1998）是否证明了意识认知与无意识认知的分离？第一个问题得到了令人放心的回答。第二个问题的回答是指出，尽管Draine和Greenwald（1998）没有声称已经建立了这样的分离，但他们提供的数据推进了该结论的合理性。
SC Draine and AG Greenwald (1998) demonstrated replicable unconscioussemantic priming by combining a response windowprocedure, which increases priming effects by requiring rapidresponding, and a regression analysis in whichthe regression intercept is a marker for unconscious cognition. Thecommentaries by BA Dosher (1998) and by PM Merikle and EM Reingold (1998) raise two questionsabout conclusions based on these methods:(a) Did Draine and Greenwald (1998) demonstrate anindirect effect (subliminal priming) in the absence of a directeffect (ie, visibility of the subliminal priming words)? and (b) Did Draine and Greenwald (1998) demonstrate dissociation of conscious fromunconscious cognition? The first question has reassuring responsesthat are reviewed here. The second question is answered by pointingout that although Draine and Greenwald (1998) did not claim to have established suchdissociation, they provided data that advance the plausibility ofthat conclusion.