The Levels of Speech Usage rating scale: comparison of client self-ratings with speech pathologist ratings.
The Levels of Speech Usage rating scale: comparison of client self-ratings with speech pathologist ratings.
复制标题
言语使用水平评级量表：客户自我评级与言语病理学家评级的比较。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00112.x
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Yorkston,Kathryn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gray,Christina;Baylor,Carolyn;Eadie,Tanya;Kendall,Diane;Yorkston,Kathryn
背景：“言语使用”一词是指人们想要或需要用言语做什么来满足其生活角色中的沟通需求。言语病理学家 (SLP) 需要了解客户的言语使用情况，以计划适当的干预措施，以实现他们的生活参与目标。言语使用水平是一个分类量表，旨在用于客户自我报告言语使用情况，但 SLP 可能希望选择将其用作代理报告工具。在以替代格式使用该工具之前，应检查自我报告和临床医生评分之间的关系。 目的：本研究的主要目的是将客户自我评分与言语使用水平量表上的 SLP 评分进行比较。第二个目的是确定 SLP 评级是否会因 SLP 是否了解客户的医疗状况而有所不同。 方法和程序：从先前的研究中可以获得患有沟通障碍的成年人在言语使用水平量表上的自我评级。关于这些人的小插曲是根据现有数据创建的。创建了两组小插图。一组包含有关人口统计信息、生活状况、职业状况以及爱好或社交活动的信息。第二组与第一组相同，增加了有关客户的医疗状况和沟通障碍的信息。出现了各种沟通障碍，包括构音障碍、声音障碍、喉切除术以及轻度认知和语言障碍。 60 个 SLP 被随机分为两组，每组对一组小插图进行评分。任务在线完成。虽然这并不能复制典型的面对面临床互动，但它是本研究的一种可行方法。对于数据分析，客户自我评级被视为固定点，并计算 SLP 评级与客户自我评级一致的百分比。 结果与结果：SLP 评级与客户自我评级完全一致的百分比为 44.9%。对于要求较低的语音使用类别，一致性最低，而对于要求最高的使用类别，一致性最高。基于医疗状况的了解，两组 SLP 之间没有显着差异。结论与启示：SLP 经常需要记录客户的言语使用水平。这项研究表明，SLP 可能会误判客户如何看待自己的演讲需求。需要进一步的研究来确定在实际的临床相互作用中是否会发现类似的结果。在此之前，SLP 在使用该工具时应征求客户的意见。
Background:The term ‘speech usage’ refers to what people want or need to do with their speech to fulfil the communication demands in their life roles. Speech–language pathologists (SLPs) need to know about clients’ speech usage to plan appropriate interventions to meet their life participation goals. The Levels of Speech Usage is a categorical scale intended for client self‐report of speech usage, but SLPs may want the option to use it as a proxy‐report tool. The relationship between self‐report and clinician ratings should be examined before the instrument is used in a proxy format.Aims:The primary purpose of this study was to compare client self‐ratings with SLP ratings on the Levels of Speech Usage scale. The secondary purpose was to determine if the SLP ratings differed depending on whether or not the SLPs knew about the clients’ medical condition.Methods & Procedures:Self‐ratings of adults with communication disorders on the Levels of Speech Usage scale were available from prior research. Vignettes about these individuals were created from existing data. Two sets of vignettes were created. One set contained information about demographic information, living situation, occupational status and hobbies or social activities. The second set was identical to the first with the addition of information about the clients’ medical conditions and communication disorders. Various communication disorders were represented including dysarthria, voice disorders, laryngectomy, and mild cognitive and language disorders. Sixty SLPs were randomly divided into two groups with each group rating one set of vignettes. The task was completed online. While this does not replicate typical in‐person clinical interactions, it was a feasible method for this study. For data analysis, the client self‐ratings were considered fixed points and the percentage of SLP ratings in agreement with the self‐ratings was calculated.Outcomes & Results:The percentage of SLP ratings in exact agreement with client self‐ratings was 44.9%. Agreement was lowest for the less‐demanding speech usage categories and highest for the most demanding usage category. There was no significant difference between the two groups of SLPs based on knowledge of medical condition.Conclusions & Implications:SLPs often need to document the speech usage levels of clients. This study suggests the potential for SLPs to misjudge how clients see their own speech demands. Further research is needed to determine if similar results would be found in actual clinical interactions. Until then, SLPs should seek the input of their clients when using this instrument.
登录
查看更多内容
言语和语言治疗师使用治疗结果测量的可靠性。
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
A. John;Pam Enderby
通讯作者：
Pam Enderby
言语使用水平：描述人们如何使用言语的自我报告量表。
影响因子：
--
作者：
Baylor,Carolyn;Yorkston,Kathryn;Eadie,Tanya;Miller,Robert;Amtmann,Dagmar
通讯作者：
Amtmann,Dagmar
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
M. Lee;Michael Drinnan;P N Carding
通讯作者：
P N Carding
患者与伴侣对声音障碍的感知。
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
R. Zraick;Brandy Y. Risner;L. Smith;Brent A. Gregg;Felicia L. Johnson;Elizabeth McWeeny
通讯作者：
Elizabeth McWeeny
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.3601.21
发表时间：
1993-02-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH
影响因子：
--
作者：
KREIMAN, J;GERRATT, BR;BERKE, GS
通讯作者：
BERKE, GS