Negotiating a 'Scary Gap': Doctoral Candidates, 'Writing Up' Qualitative Data and the Contemporary Supervisory Relationship
Negotiating a 'Scary Gap': Doctoral Candidates, 'Writing Up' Qualitative Data and the Contemporary Supervisory Relationship
复制标题
协商“可怕的差距”：博士候选人、“撰写”定性数据和当代监管关系
DOI：
10.11114/jets.v1i1.10
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Humphrey R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Humphrey R
“撰写”定性数据的复杂任务为博士生及其导师提供了困难和挑战，这往往会对导师关系产生不利影响。这些影响可能会因主管目前所感受到的压力而加剧，尤其是确保其下属及时提交报告。我们在这里认为，这些压力是部分负责监督教学法从关系到过程接地的转变。本文通过对英国一系列跨学科研究培训讲习班的博士生及其导师的访谈分析，阐述了这些影响的一些后果，这些讲习班旨在为从事定性数据写作的博士生提供帮助。在这些讲习班上，博士候选人沿着与博士周期同一阶段的同行一起短暂地参加了一个住宅讲习班，这些同行远离他们的机构。
The complex task of "writing up" qualitative data provides difficulties and challenges for both doctoral candidates and their supervisors, which can often result in detrimental effects on the supervisory relationship. These effects can be heightened by the pressures currently felt by supervisors, not least to ensure their supervisees submit in a timely fashion. We argue here that these pressures are in part responsible for a shift in supervisory pedagogy from a relational to a processual grounding. This article addresses some of the consequences of these effects via analysis of interviews with doctoral candidates and their supervisors from a series of interdisciplinary research training workshops in the UK designed to provide help for doctoral candidates engaged in writing up qualitative data. In these workshops doctoral candidates came together briefly for a residential workshop along with peers at the same stage of the doctoral cycle who were away from their institutional