TIARA 2.0: an interactive tool for annotating discourse structure and text improvement

TIARA 2.0: an interactive tool for annotating discourse structure and text improvement
复制标题

TIARA 2.0:用于注释话语结构和文本改进的交互式工具

DOI:
10.1007/s10579-021-09566-0
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Simone Teufel and Takenobu Tokunaga
Simone Teufel and Takenobu Tokunaga
中科院分区:
计算机科学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jan Wira Gotama Putra;Kana Matsumura;Simone Teufel and Takenobu Tokunaga

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

语篇结构标注旨在分析语篇单元(例如句子或从句)之间如何相互关联以及它们在整个语篇中扮演什么角色。已经开发了几种用于语篇结构的注释工具。然而,它们通常只支持特定的注释方案,这使得它们的使用仅限于新方案。本文介绍了 TIARA 2.0,一种用于话语结构和文本改进的注释工具。脱离我们的具体需求,我们扩展了现有的工具以适应四个级别的注释:篇章结构、论证结构、句子重排和内容更改。与现有工具相比,后两者尤其独特。 TIARA 基于标准网络技术实现,可以轻松定制。它通过系统地简化布局并提供交互式可视化(包括减少混乱的功能和双视图显示)来处理注释过程中的视觉复杂性。 TIARA 的文本视图允许注释者专注于分析句子之间的逻辑顺序。树状视图使他们能够根据整体话语结构来回顾他们的分析。除了作为注释工具外,它还被设计用于论证教学中的教育目的;这使其比其他现有工具更具优势。
Discourse structure annotation aims at analysing how discourse units (e.g. sentences or clauses) relate to each other and what roles they play in the overall discourse. Several annotation tools for discourse structure have been developed. However, they often only support specific annotation schemes, making their usage limited to new schemes. This article presents TIARA 2.0, an annotation tool for discourse structure and text improvement. Departing from our specific needs, we extend an existing tool to accommodate four levels of annotation: discourse structure, argumentative structure, sentence rearrangement and content alteration. The latter two are particularly unique compared to existing tools. TIARA is implemented on standard web technologies and can be easily customised. It deals with the visual complexity during the annotation process by systematically simplifying the layout and by offering interactive visualisation, including clutter-reducing features and dual-view display. TIARA’s text-view allows annotators to focus on the analysis of logical sequencing between sentences. The tree-view allows them to review their analysis in terms of the overall discourse structure. Apart from being an annotation tool, it is also designed to be useful for educational purposes in the teaching of argumentation; this gives it an edge over other existing tools.
为老师和朋友争论:八年级学生在评判和修改说服性文章时对论证特征的敏感性
DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2020.1803032
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Lisa B. Hsin;C. Snow
通讯作者: C. Snow
视觉注意力的混合划分
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊: PLoS ONE
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Yuechuan Sun;Sijing Wu;I. Spence
通讯作者: I. Spence
对比修辞学的新方向
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
U. Connor
通讯作者: U. Connor
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001
发表时间: 2010-09-01
影响因子: 3
作者:
Bacha, Nahla Nola
通讯作者: Bacha, Nahla Nola
学习者的二语英语论文是如何编辑的
DOI: --
发表时间: 2017
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Ishikawa Shin'ichiro;石川慎一郎;石川慎一郎;石川慎一郎;石川慎一郎;石川慎一郎;石川 慎一郎;石川 慎一郎;石川 慎一郎;石川 慎一郎;石川 慎一郎;石川 慎一郎;石川慎一郎;Shin'ichiro ISHIKAWA;石川慎一郎;Shin'ichiro ISHIKAWA;Shin'ichiro ISHIKAWA;Shin'ichiro ISHIKAWA;石川慎一郎;石川慎一郎;石川慎一郎;石川慎一郎
通讯作者: 石川慎一郎