Early Spelling Acquisition: Does Writing Really Beat the Computer?
Early Spelling Acquisition: Does Writing Really Beat the Computer?
复制标题
早期拼写习得：写作真的能打败计算机吗？
DOI：
10.2307/1510245
复制
发表时间：
1992
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Jane Gordon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Vaughn;J. Schumm;Jane Gordon
本研究旨在评估手写、字母拼贴和计算机辅助教学对正常学习和学习障碍小学生早期拼写习得的影响。该研究重复并扩展了Cunningham和Stanovich（1990）的研究。48名小学生（24名非学习障碍学生; 24名学习障碍学生）在三种实验条件下接受拼写训练，这些实验条件涉及不同类型的教学活动：写作、排序字母瓦片或在计算机上打字。结果表明，LD和NLD组之间没有显着差异的单词拼写正确的任何三个条件。由于在各种条件和组中学习的拼写单词的数量很低，因此检查了正确学习的二元组的数量。没有组内差异出现的条件（写作，瓷砖，计算机），然而，组间的显着差异被发现的双字母组学习的写作，瓷砖，计算机，与NLD组优于LD组在所有三个条件。在所有三种条件下，也观察到二元组的统计学显著时间效应。与Cunningham和Stanovich（1990年）的研究不同，结果并没有重复NLD组手写条件的优越性，也没有发现手写条件对LD组更有效。
This research evaluated the efficacy of handwriting, letter tiles, and computer-based instruction on the early spelling acquisition of normal achieving (NLD) and learning disabled (LD) elementary students. The study replicated and extended the Cunningham and Stanovich (1990) study. Forty-eight primary-grade students (24 non-learning disabled; 24 learning disabled) received spelling training under three experimental conditions that involved different types of instructional activity: writing, sorting letter tiles, or typing on the computer. Results indicated no significant differences between the LD and NLD groups on words spelled correctly for any of the three conditions. Since the number of spelling words learned was low across conditions and groups, the number of correctly learned bigrams was examined. No within-group differences emerged for condition (writing, tile, computer); however, significant differences between the groups were found on number of bigrams learned for writing, tile, and computer, with the NLD group outperforming the LD group on all three conditions. Statistically significant time effects for bigrams were also noted for all three conditions. Unlike the Cunningham and Stanovich (1990) study, results did not replicate the superiority of the handwriting condition for the NLD group, nor was the handwriting condition found to be significantly more effective for the LD group.