Inadequate access to surgeons: reason for disparate cancer care?
Inadequate access to surgeons: reason for disparate cancer care?
复制标题
无法充分接触外科医生:癌症护理不同的原因?
DOI:
10.1097/mlr.0b013e31819e1f17
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Given,CharlesW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bradley,CathyJ;Dahman,Bassam;Given,CharlesW
Objective:To compare the likelihood of seeing a surgeon between elderly dually eligible non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colon cancer patients and their Medicare counterparts. Surgery rates between dually eligible and Medicare patients who were evaluated by a surgeon were also assessed.Methods:We used statewide Medicaid and Medicare data merged with the Michigan Tumor Registry to extract a sample of patients with a first primary NSCLC (n= 1100) or colon cancer (n= 2086). The study period was from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2000. We assessed the likelihood of a surgical evaluation using logistic models that included patient characteristics, tumor stage, and census tracts. Among patients evaluated by a surgeon, we used logistic regression to predict if a resection was performed.Results:Dually eligible patients were nearly half as likely to be evaluated by a surgeon as Medicare patients (odds ratio [OR]= 0.49; 95% confidence interval= 0.32, 0.77 and odds ratio= 0.59; 95% confidence interval= 0.41, 0.86 for NSCLC and colon cancer patients, respectively). Among patients who were evaluated by a surgeon, the likelihood of resection was not statistically significantly different between dually eligible and Medicare patients.Conclusions:This study suggests that dually eligible patients, in spite of having Medicaid insurance, are less likely to be evaluated by a surgeon relative to their Medicare counterparts. Policies and interventions aimed toward increasing access to specialists and complete diagnostic work-ups (eg, colonoscopy, bronchoscopy) are needed.