The waste-to-energy framework for integrated multi-waste utilization: Waste cooking oil, waste lubricating oil, and waste plastics
The waste-to-energy framework for integrated multi-waste utilization: Waste cooking oil, waste lubricating oil, and waste plastics
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.001
复制
发表时间：
2010-06
期刊：
影响因子：
9
通讯作者：
Ampaitepin Singhabhandhu;T. Tezuka
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ampaitepin Singhabhandhu;T. Tezuka
废物产生能源被认为是废物管理的一种方法，具有能源回收的好处。从废物转化为能源的角度来看，废食用油、废润滑油和废塑料由于其高热值而被认为是用于能源转化的原料的良好候选者。相对于单独管理这三种废物而言，一体化共处理的理念有望获得更大的效益。共处理这些废物的规模经济和协同效应导致最终产品的质量和产量更高。本研究利用成本效益分析法，对“三废”回收与能源化的综合管理方案进行评估。我们报告的热解油在最大和最小的转化率的燃烧的总热量，并进行敏感性分析，其中的参数的增加的电力成本的操作过程和增加的原料运输成本进行了测试。我们评估的规模经济的综合废物管理的情况下的影响。我们比较了四种情况下的废物转化为能源与业务照常（BAU）的情况下，我们的研究结果表明，综合共处理的废食用油，废润滑油，废塑料是最有利可图的能源产量和经济的观点。
Energy generation by wastes is considered one method of waste management that has the benefit of energy recovery. From the waste-to-energy point of view, waste cooking oil, waste lubricating oil, and waste plastics have been considered good candidates for feedstocks for energy conversion due to their high heating values. Compared to the independent management of these three wastes, the idea of co-processing them in integration is expected to gain more benefit. The economies of scale and the synergy of co-processing these wastes results in higher quality and higher yield of the end products. In this study, we use cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the integrated management scenario of collecting the three wastes and converting them to energy. We report the total heat of combustion of pyrolytic oil at the maximum and minimum conversion rates, and conduct a sensitivity analysis in which the parameters of an increase of the electricity cost for operating the process and increase of the feedstock transportation cost are tested. We evaluate the effects of economy of scale in the case of integrated waste management. We compare four cases of waste-to-energy conversion with the business as usual (BAU) scenario, and our results show that the integrated co-processing of waste cooking oil, waste lubricating oil, and waste plastics is the most profitable from the viewpoints of energy yield and economics.