Head and neck lesions: Characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging

Head and neck lesions: Characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging
复制标题

DOI:
10.1148/radiol.2202010063
复制
发表时间:
2001-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
19.7
通讯作者:
Ishiyama, T
Ishiyama, T
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang, JC;Takashima, S;Ishiyama, T

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:评价从扩散加权回波平面磁共振(MR)图像计算的表观扩散系数(adc)是否可以用于表征头颈部病变。材料与方法:对97例患者的97个头颈部病变,采用1.5 t MR对其进行弥散加权回波平面磁共振成像。图像的扩散加权因子b分别为0、500和1000 sec/mm(2),并构建ADC图。计算病变、脑脊液和脊髓的adc。结果:81例(84%)患者获得可接受的ADC测量图像。恶性淋巴瘤的平均ADC为(0.66 +/- 0.17[SD]) × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 13),显著小于癌(P < 0.001)。癌的平均ADC为(1.13 +/- 0.43)× 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 36),显著小于良性实体瘤(P = 0.002)。良性实体瘤的平均ADC为(1.56 +/- 0.51)× 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 22),显著小于良性囊性病变的平均值(2.05 +/- 0.62)× 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 10) (P = 0.035)。脑脊液和脊髓的平均ADC在四组病变间无显著差异。当ADC小于1.22 X 10(-3) mm(2)/sec用于预测恶性肿瘤时,最高准确率为86%,灵敏度为84%,特异性为91%。结论:adc的测定可用于头颈部病变的表征。
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) calculated from diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance (MR) images can be used to characterize head and neck lesions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging was performed with a 1.5-T MR unit in 97 head and neck lesions in 97 patients. Images were obtained with a diffusion-weighted factor, factor b, of 0, 500, and 1,000 sec/mm(2) and an ADC map was constructed. The ADCs of lesions, cerebrospinal fluid, and spinal cord were calculated.RESULTS: Acceptable images for ADC measurement were obtained in 81 (84%) patients. The mean ADC of malignant lymphomas, (0.66 +/- 0.17[SD]) X 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 13), was significantly smaller (P < .001) than that of carcinomas. The mean ADC of carcinomas, (1.13 +/- 0.43) X 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 36), was significantly smaller (P = .002) than that of benign solid tumors. The mean ADC of benign solid tumors, (1.56 +/- 0.51) X 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 22), was significantly smaller (P = .035) than that of benign cystic lesions, (2.05 +/- 0.62) X 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 10). No significant differences were seen in the mean ADC of cerebrospinal fluid and of spinal cord among four groups of lesions. When an ADC smaller than 1.22 X 10(-3) mm(2)/sec was used for predicting malignancy, the highest accuracy of 86%, with 84% sensitivity and 91% specificity, was obtained.CONCLUSION: Measurement of ADCs may be used to characterize head and neck lesions.