An Ecological Critique of the Sensory Conflict Theory of Motion Sickness

An Ecological Critique of the Sensory Conflict Theory of Motion Sickness
复制标题

对晕动病感觉冲突理论的生态学批判

DOI:
10.1207/s15326969eco0303_1
复制
发表时间:
1991
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
G. Riccio
G. Riccio
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Stoffregen;G. Riccio

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在这篇文章中,我们提出了一个批评的感觉冲突理论的晕动病。我们讨论了三种形式的感官冲突,被认为存在:输入冲突,输出冲突和预期违反。我们认为,任何概念的感官冲突必然涉及违反内部的期望,因此,这三种形式的冲突在逻辑上是相同的。在运动病的文献中,暗示预期的模式是视觉、前庭和躯体感觉系统的输入是多余的。我们认为,与环境的相互作用不可能导致冗余的预期。我们回顾的数据表明,非冗余模式的联运刺激导致适应性变化的控制行为,这意味着计算的致危冲突必须无关的控制行为。此外,我们认为,没有一种单一的感官刺激模式,多余的或其他方式,可以作为一个可靠的…
In this article we present a critique of the sensory conflict theory of motion sickness. We discuss three forms of sensory conflict that are believed to exist: input conflict, output conflict, and expectancy violation. We argue that any concept of sensory conflict necessarily entails the violation of internal expectations and, hence, that the three forms of conflict are logically identical. In the motion sickness literature, it is implicit that the expected pattern is one in which the inputs of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems are redundant. We argue that an expectation of redundancy cannot plausibly result from interaction with the environment. We review data indicating that nonredundant patterns of intermodal stimulation lead to adaptive changes in the control of behavior; this implies that the calculation of nauseogenic conflict must be unrelated to the control of behavior. Moreover, we argue that no single pattern of sensory stimulation, redundant or otherwise, can serve as a reliable...
DOI: 10.3109/00016488309130935
发表时间: 1983
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
Igarashi,M;Isago,H;O-Uchi,T;Kulecz,WB;Homick,JL;Reschke,MF
通讯作者: Reschke,MF
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1986.55.6.1369
发表时间: 1986-06-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
HORAK, FB;NASHNER, LM
通讯作者: NASHNER, LM